I've used every version of Windows between 3.11 and 10. I don't remember ever noticing that either.

Our version only had 5 layers:

• honey
• milk
• dish soap
• water
• vegetable oil

The jar stayed out for a week before we finally cleaned it up and in that time only the dish soap and water mixed (which happened within the first hour)

It's not. If you're really into pop culture and you frequently make such references then someone who is not will have a hard time communicating with you.

It's not about internet culture being bad, it's about the communication gap between people with very different cultural references.

kill way less people

I believe the danger axis is about danger to the passengers, not others

I just did that last week for my son (he found it in a science book). The dish soap and water slowly mixed together into a single layer.

I always thought it was for lighters

Not likely a real person, or an edit that was reverted.

On one had, responding like that is definitely a sign that it's not going to work. On the other hand, that's a perfectly normal feeling for a person who doesn't live their life on the internet.

It's not lying or hallucinating. It's describing exactly what it found in search results. There's an web page with that title from that date. Now the problem is that the web page is pinterest and the title is the result of aggressive SEO. These types of SEO practices are what made Google largely useless for the past several years and an AI that is based on these useless results will be just as useless.

With the introduction of AJAX, web pages became apps. It was the advent of SPAs and SASS. Which enabled the things you saw as a consumer.

sounds like you're contradicting yourself there

Where's the contradiction?

not sure how that's an "American" idea

That's where I heard this perspective from. That you either believe in science or in God, not both. I guess it's because of all the weird Christian denominations in the US that say crazy things and seem to have never actually read the bible, but use it to justify their anti-science ideas.

Yes, sometimes I see something that looks interesting and click to learn more. But I think more often than not I'll just open an incognito window and search for it instead of clicking on the ad.

God's existence, by definition, cannot be proven or disproven. That's the nature of faith and free will (in the theological sense). And that's why there are scientists who believe in God. This American idea that religion and science are opposites makes no sense.

it doesn't just have to be grape wine either

People in my country make hard spirits out of various fruits, but mostly plums, and in English those are being translated as fruit brandy.

Although if you want to make cognac (a type of brandy), it has to be grape wine.

Cognac, like Champagne, is about where it's made, not just the recipe. I has to be made out of specific varieties of grapes harvested and fermented in the Cognac area in France. You can import the same grapes and follow the same recipe, but you're not allowed to name it Cognac if you made it outside that area.

Yes, that's what I said. My native language is a romance language too. And after speaking it her whole life, my wife has trouble getting the grasp of how in English swapping two words completely changes the meaning of what she's saying (especially when it's two nouns, like e.g. "parent council")

The thing is that in French, Spanish, etc. it still makes sense if you put the adjective before the noun, even if it might sound weird in some cases. An adjective is an adjective and a noun is a noun.

But English is positional. Where you put a word gives it its function. So "red car" and "car red" mean different things.

open_dialog_file or dialog_open_file?

They're both part of the Hexanchiformes order, which are seven gill sharks. So the cow shark article is wrong, there are two surviving families with more than five gills.

Looks like there's an overlap. Cloud shark is a family (Hexanchidae), and frilled sharks are part of that family.

Except for these species, classified as living fossils:

• Blind shark (Brachaelurus waddi)
• Bullhead shark (Heterodontus sp.)
• Cow shark (sixgill sharks and relatives) (Hexanchidae)
• Elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii)
• Frilled shark (Chlamydoselachus sp.)
• Goblin shark (Mitsukurina owstoni)
• Gulper shark (Centrophorus sp.)