Thanks!

I guess I could upload the kra files (there are four of them since I made each panel separately, exported them to png and arranged them a fourth krita doc). Tho if I did that, would it even count as open source? A .kra file isn't really a source code, it's an archive that contains binaries.

Baby don't hurt me

I have no idea how British people pronounce it, I don't believe I've ever discussed water bottles with a British person. I jut saw the meme and was reminded of another meme I'd once seen.

Uh, by accident. I'll edit the link.

At least, after being demoted to asteroid Ceres was re-promoted to Dwarf Planet. Imagine having once been called a planet and being considered an asteroid. Imagine being Pallas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdEfrEmojAs&t=0

I believe Krita is on F-Droid and it's my go-to program on desktop, tho I couldn't get ot to work correctly on my phone or the outdated tablets I could get my hands on (it launched, but I was stuck on a part of the screen and couldn't move, or close the window that opens at the start to create a document because the "close" button was outside my screen). so I don't know how it'll be on your tablet.

That aside, I really didn't find many open source Android apps for Graphic design. I sometimes use Pocket Paint, but it sucks and I only use it to make comically bad art for memes.

Come on, why would Pluto want to keep hanging out with the planets, the dwarf planet club is much bigger and cooler. And either way, pluto has a moon named Charon that's so big it's debated whether ot should be called a moon or another dwarf planet...

No need to ask, he's a smooth can opener

Smooooooooth can openerrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Wow, you go straight to hating it without leaving your seat? I usually have to either go to sleep or go out to do something else to leave some time for my idea of the drawing to grow further from the actual drawing before it happens.

[Edit: I answered as if it were about a drawing when it's about a text. I don't have any funny or useful insight to give about the later, since I can't relate: Everything I've ever written was perfect. Also, I don't write.]

He'll get very virulent in the X vs Wayland debate before he even learns what these mean.

If a RHT^1 is causing if I find that not only the FYGAT^2 doesn't always suffice, but the intuitive technique of TOSE^3 tends to be counterproductive. What I do to stop RHTs is instead broadening my field of vision to look at everything at once and simultaneously trying to listen to every sound I can hear at once. Any given thought or information can be somehow integrated into a RHT and feed it, but many informations at once can't.

!^1 : Random Horny Thought!<

!^2 : Flex Your Glutes And Thighs!<

!^3 : Think Of Something Else!<

I don't find that this adage applies that well in politics. Yeah, I'll assume whoever almost hit me with his car the other day was stupid/irresponsible/distracted rather than that they were attempting to murder me. Or that someone who gave me wrong directions to somewhere was mistaken rather than deceitful. That is because stupidity can explain these things, but stupidity on its own doesn't explain becoming president.

Beside, if you assume he was being used by dickcheneys, you're still assuming malice, just not from the same person.

As for which case his behavior would make most sense in, I won't try to contradict you since I'm not good at analysing people and don't enjoy trying.

I just tend to think of Trump+close collaborators as a system and assume the purpose of a system is what it does, and I don't make too many assumptions of Trump's exact place in this.

https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/wolf

With people in power it's always hard to say whether a bad thing they do is due to stupidity or ill-intent, tho I tend to favor the second hypothesis.

All of their actions did benefit a group. For Trump, most obviously, himself; but he also advanced the power of the American far-right and probably some companies thanks to lose regulations. For Bush, he clearly aimed to give more power to companies over things formerly done by the state, like hurricane relief or even the military. His vice president Dick Cheney famously profited from the Iraq war through the company Halliburton.

Many of Bush's policies had a disastrous human cost, but they were very efficient at filling the pockets of a few shareholders. So was he an incompetent buffoon playing into the hands of the capitalists, or was he himself an evil schemer who willingly enriched those he deemed worthy allies at the expense of the rest of the world?

Same question applies to Trump. A narrative people like is that of the out of control puppet. An idiot that the Republican Party tried to use because he was attractive to their target demographic, but who ended up turning against his puppeteers and giving full reign to his folly.

But it's also possible that he is a smart and evil man who's particularly talented at playing the role of a madman and who saw it was working.

So basically, I have no definite knowledge of the intelligence of either man.

It is good.

Idk, I've heard government cheese was mid.

You'd think they'd get Sinai right..