Proton est très bien aussi. Il y a eu une histoire d'adresse IP française donnée à la justice (enfin pour protonmail, pas le vpn) mais une entreprise devra toujours obéir aux lois de son pays. Il faudrait regarder les différences entre les lois en Suède (pour mullvad) et en Suisse (pour proton) mais ça dépasse mes compétences.

Mais dans tous les cas si ce que tu veux faire peut entrainer une procédure internationale un VPN n'est pas suffisant.

Mullvad est très bien, seul point noir c'est qu'ils sont un peu plus cher que la moyenne (mais ils le méritent) et qu'ils ne permettent pas la redirection de port pour faire du P2P.

Petit rappel que si ce tu fais est vraiment risqué un VPN ce n'est pas une protection suffisante. Après si c'est juste consulter des sites ça suffit, tout dépend de ton modèle de menace.

Quelqu'un avait conseillé une appli équivalente. Vous en rappelez-vous ?

Briar ?

https://github.com/bash-lsp/bash-language-server#dependencies

Bash LSP server can use shellcheck and shfmt but you have to install those manually.

Funny thing is that LSP was actually created for VSCode. That's the now standard protocol to decouple language specific things (completion, formatting, linting…) from the editor so you don't have to use an editor for each language. You can now use any editor that supports LSP, either directly or through a plugin, and turn it into a fully fledged IDE by installing the LSP servers for the language you need. I guess some VSCode plugins use LSP under the hood and just embed the server.

Is pluging a LSP server that hard on vscode/intellij? Because it's automatic with a lot of LSP clients, open a .sh file, get asked if you want to install the corresponding LSP server, answer yes and that's it. Some LSP clients don't do automatic server install but you just have to install the server with your packet manager. At least that's how it is with vim / emacs.

You don't need a plugin, just use the bash LSP server with any editor that support LSP servers. It supports explainshell, shellcheck and shfmt.

I don't use the same clients for viewing and editing.

I mostly use OSMAnd for viewing (but it can do editing too). To edit I use StreetComplete for easy, gamified, contribution and Vespucci if I need a full on editor. StreetComplete only ask you missing information about the things around you, if I want to add something new I use Vespucci).

There are a lot of tags that can be used about restaurants: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant#Tags_used_in_combination

But it depends on which client display which tags.

uBlock Origin also does a lot more than just block request, I'm not sure features like cname uncloacking would be feasible as an userscript.

Why would you trust Greasemonkey and some random script over uBlockOrigin?

Also it might be possible to do it partly but performance would inevitably be worse and I'm not sure every functionality would be implementable.

Not sure Privacy Badger brings anything, it stopped doing local learning a long time ago. Just enable the anti tracking lists in uBO.

Ditch oh my zsh, install the plugins directly.

Because zsh is very fast and light. I'm using it with only a handful of plugins, manually installed, and starship

Those are just some uses of malwares. It's not always that noticeable.

This is the first time you noticed you caught a malware. I wouldn't be so confident about never having caught one and Im way more paranoid than you. This one was just really noisy.

Gas station app?

I have only uBlock Origin and no YouTube update has gotten past it (except the first one for a few hours), I never get "disable adblocker" messages either. Also anti adblockers are not blacklist based.

Twice the chances of being detected

Double the attack surface

Half the performance

It really does not work like that. If you need a second adblocker to block somethings just enable the block list of the second one in the first one.

In fact just use uBlock Origin and be done with it.

Why would you use two adblockers?