I don’t know, you don’t know, no one knows.. at least not for certain. That’s my point. If I wanted to try my luck with being an oracle, I’d play the lottery ;-)
What I’m challenging is to just plainly saying “nope well never need anymore computational power in our device”..
My point was that we cannot predict the future, saying something like;
we are “there” with processing power
Will be as incorrect as
640Kb should be enough for anybody
It’s just impossible to predict, not only how we will utilize our tools, but also what the consumer wants in 10 years or so.
Besides, narrowing the scope of the device down to “just” gaming is a limited viewpoint.
640Kb should be enough for anyone
I don’t think the entire world is required to know about American politics.. only the western counties suffers from American influence
There are several different arctic programs.. take a look at the different programs, maybe you’ll find something
My man corrected it. Now it says “reverse nepotism baby”
Half of the voters indeed, probably more than half the country
Sure it is autonomous, but most things are still taken care of by Denmark, such as police, medical needs etc. even immigration to Greenland is applied through Danish authorities.
I think they mostly follow Danish laws, with some exceptions, (Greenland does not accept refugees as an example).
AFAIK Greenland immigration laws are the danish immigration laws, as Greenland is part of Denmark. And yes, we do have very strict immigration policy here
Whatever graphic card you have in your system is probably not required for programming
I’d also bet that it’s more than 30% in the US
Don’t mind him, incels gonna incel
After the release of cyberpunk, I don’t really wanna be hyped up by promises from CDPR. We’ll see in 7-10 years how the game’ll be
I worked with a company that used product data from competitors (you can debate the morals of it, but everyone is doing it). Their crawlers were set up so that each new line of requests came from a new IP.. I don’t recall the name of the service, and it was not that many unique IP’s but it did allow their crawlers to live unhindered..
They didn’t do IP banning for the same reasoning, but they did notice one of their competitors did not alter their IP when scraping them. If they had malicious intend, they could have changed data around for that IP only. Eg. increasing the prices, or decreasing the prices so they had bad data..
I’d imagine companies like OpenAI has many times the IP, and they’d be able to do something similarly.. meaning if you try’n ban IP’s, you might hit real users as well.. which would be unfortunate.
It’s not fiat.
Now give me a slap daddy
2080 super