gapbetweenus @ gapbetweenus @feddit.de

Posts

3

Comments

1,404

Joined

2 yr. ago

I see, since you are for outlawing books it all falls into places.

Where you draw the line? And who is drawing it? Will you be equally happy when conservatives will use the same tools against opinions they see as dangerous?

I would say police brutality does not really knows border, a truly international habit. And actually Europe, at least some places are rather less into it than it's the case around the world.

Sick people are inspired to violence by all kind of thing, are we going to outlaw Catcher in the Rye?

Absolutely, now it's the standard but limited email storage space was rather standard.

That's cryptic.

I'm from Germany, the only way insulting someone is going to be a criminal case is if you insult police. Otherwise it gets almost always dropped.

So you want the government to decide which ideas are ok and which should be banned? How could this ever go wrong.

So who is deciding what opinions are puting people in danger. US government for example thinks that whistleblowers Manning and journalist like Assange are puting people in danger.

The question is where the line is drawn and how to make sure the state is not abusing those powers to suppress opinions that it sees dangerous. A good example are cases when protecting the children is used as argument for more surveillance. This seems foelr me to go along the same lines.

But they also offered a really good product, especially when it came to spam filter compared with other email services at that time.

Some are and some aren't. Like a lot of folks on here are here because reddit went to shit.

Her opinion on trans folks is shit, but people should not go to jail for shit opinions. Broken clock and stuff.

That's why to reduce homelessness you provide people with unconditional housing, like housing first approach in Finland.

https://github.com/Diolinux/PhotoGIMP

There is a photoshop skin for gimp.

For a lot of folks Trump is representation of masculinity. I think it's something worth reflecting on.

how can the Fediverse grow without loosing its soul in the process?

It can't? Rather obvious that the "soul" of a community is defined by it's members and the bigger the community the more mainstream this soul will become. Maybe the federation mechanic offers some solutions here, but that remains to be seen.

Ich würde mit so Vorschlägen vorsichtig sein, wenn die konservativ, religiösen rausginden das sie eigentlich alle das gleiche wollen und sich zusammen tun - sieht es schlecht aus.

Ich sehr nicht wirklich, wie mein Tanzen sich negativ auf streng gläubige Christen auswirkt.

You need a drone to play it, than it's kind of free for all.