TBH, buying a cheap Chinese burner phone with no security relevant data on it just for traveling to the US, might be better security wise than buying an expensive Google Pixel Phone with GrapheneOS on it.
Especially now where Google, a US company and bound by its laws, that produces these devices, might (start) hand(ing) out backdoor keys to their hardware.
I suppose some of that comes down to the personal understanding of what "smart" is.
I guess you could call some person, that doesn't understand a topic, but still manages to sound reasonable when talking about it, and might even convince people that they actually have a deep understanding of that topic, "smart", in a kind of "smart imposter".
The title of this post is "Self-Driving Tesla Crashes into Wall Painted to Look Like a Road… Just Months Before Planned Robotaxi Launch". In order to know that someone was sitting in the car, you have to watch the video.
We are never recovering as a Nation from this. This kind of violation of the order of law in our nation will take a century to heal if not more. The United States as it was is gone, full stop.
Well, that is the goal. I think the goal is to create a (US/global) crisis, which allows the powerful (rich) to step in to reshape the society, to fit their agenda better.
I do not think that the Trump administration is simply incompetent, I think they are having a plan, and are executing it and what we see is part of it.
What makes implementation so difficult is that browsers cannot just "work", they need to be correct in what they do. And support all websites.
The standards of HTML, CSS and JS have developed over a long time, not only is the amount of stuff massive, over time sometimes strange features where implemented, that were then used by website developers, and now these all need to be handled correctly by all new browsers.
Emulating and reimplementing existing stuff is often more difficult, especially if you cannot leave out any feature, no matter how obscure, because that might break someone's website.
But as long as they are RISC V chips, then they would run the same software as any other RISC V chips.
Not necessarily, RISC-V is permissibly licensed, so they could add proprietary extensions, that would make the binaries or even compilers only work with their implementation of the RISC-V ISA.
Embrace, Extend, Extinguish tactics would work on RISC-V, and I trust billionaires and huge corporations to enshittify it.
Big player joins RISC-V, creates design, introduces proprietary extensions, builds compilers that use them, software depend on them, other RISC-V designers need to license them, because the whole platform now depends on them.
Also based on how complicate it is to port Linux to different SoCs, which at least share a common ISA, it will be much more difficult if you need to support even more RISC-V ISAs with different proprietary extensions, not only in the kernel, but in the toolchain as well.
AFAIK, UEFI isn't technically a requirement. However, TPM 2.0 is, and that requires UEFI.
TPM 2.0 does not require UEFI. I have a system here with TPM 2.0 and only legacy boot support. And you can just buy a TPM 2.0 module and connect it with any board, that has a SPI connector.
China ist autoritär und die Demokratie der US auch am bröckeln, noch nicht so schlimm wie bei Russlamd und China, aber unter Trump wohl auf den Weg dahin. Und auch schon davor war sie schon sehr vom Geld vereinnahmt. Auch bei uns haben wir jetzt die nächsten Jahre jemand am Ruder der scheinbar nicht so viel von gelebter Demokratie hält.
Würde eher sagen das außenpolitische Themen in der US bei der Bevölkerung ziemlich egal sind, wenn die nicht ihren Alltag beeinflussen.
Denen muss eigenredet werden das sie auch betroffen sein könnten, bevor die sich interessieren. Deswegen war Vance auch so allergisch als Selensky meinte das sie auch in der US angst haben sollten, und sie der Ozean nicht beschützt. Danach hatte das Gespräch dann plötzlich einen anderen Klang.
Will man nicht, das ist der Sinn der Brandmauer; man möchte nicht mit den Stimmen der AfD Gesetze durchbringen. Also bleiben nur die Linken für eine 2/3
Mehrheit.
Nun das war auch ein Thema vor der Wahl, wo die die Linke noch nicht im Bundestag war.
Jetzt sind sie drin, und wenn die hier ihre Meinung ändern würden könnte man wohl eine 2/3 Mehrheit in diesen wichtigen Außenpolitischen Themen haben. Das steht auf der Kippe.
Mit Stimmen aus der AfD möchte man nichts abschließen, darum geht es bei der Brandmauer.
2019 hat Gysi gemeint das es so toll wäre wenn Deutschland neutral zwischen Russland und der US (und dem Westen) sitzen würde.
Also ich finde ja es sollte hier nicht die Position von Deutschland und einer linken Partei sein neutral zu autoritären Regimen zu sein. Dazu sollten wir schon eine klarere Stellung pro Demokratie haben.
Zusammen mit ihrer vergleichsweiser sanften Art im Ukraine Konflikt Russland gegenüber, mache ich mir schon auch Gedanken.
TBH, it is very difficult to me differentiating between the different flavors of authoritarians.
Maybe someone can make an easy to understand comparison matrix? You know, "Kills people because they have a different opinion.", "Suppresses minorities.", etc.
TBH, buying a cheap Chinese burner phone with no security relevant data on it just for traveling to the US, might be better security wise than buying an expensive Google Pixel Phone with GrapheneOS on it.
Especially now where Google, a US company and bound by its laws, that produces these devices, might (start) hand(ing) out backdoor keys to their hardware.