Absolutely, there's lots of possibilities. But I don't think that negates the point that the most sensible approach to any unknown situation is to be cautious and lie low until you fully understand the situation.
Of course, flawed as we are, we're not doing that, as we aren't responding to other potential existential threats.
The best estimates of how many intelligent civilizations there should be suggest that the galaxy should be teeming with them. If any of them evolved mere millions of years before we did, given our pace of technological improvement they should have figured out interstellar travel by now, and they should be broadcasting communication across the galaxy like we're doing. Yet we've detected nothing. Why?
A possible explanation is that an advanced civilization is exterminating all other civilizations, perhaps to avoid competition. It seems like a sensible approach to lie low until we can figure this out, just in case.
Any digital image is actually red green and blue, those are the colors of the pixels on your monitor. When there's enough of them your brain is tricked into seeing other colors. To get even more meta, all colors are just made up by your brain.
So I don't understand your distinction between black and white, and grayscale. Whether it's a gray made of black and white pixels or a "pure gray" doesn't matter, it can look the same. Unless it's a style where the pixels are supposed to be visible, e.g. pointillism.
NZF said they wouldn't work with Labor and Labor said they wouldn't work with NZF. The voters would feel justifiably betrayed if they ignored those promises. And I see no reason why the left coalition would work together any better. Can you imagine NZF and TPM agreeing on anything?
I don't understand why the parties play the game of ruling in or out. Surely it's better to pretend they will work with any other party, it puts them in a much stronger negotiating position.
Running is an underrated mode of transport. For some reason it's socially acceptable to exert yourself hard while on a bike, but not running. When combined with public transport it can make all the difference to be able to make a tight transfer by sprinting for it.
Is this really substantial? With a skilled manual driver or a clever automatic gearbox, the majority of braking should be engine braking. It seems to me that regenerative braking is typically replacing what would be engine braking, the unplanned stops still use friction brakes.
Only at low speeds. At high speeds for a modern car the tyre noise is louder that the engine noise, and since electric cars are heavier they would be noisier.
And reduce the propping of petrostates
Replace mining oil with mining rare metals. Not a big improvement.
They also help normalise the usage of renewable energy (this is a factor that shouldn't be overlooked, imo)
Why? Electric cars are causing a huge load on the grid and will continue to do so. In countries that haven't managed the load and invested heavily in renewable capacity, those EVs are powered by fossil fuels.
There's nuances here, but in principle you are incorrect. A car can be assumed to be infinitely heavier than a pedestrian. That means that every part of their body that's in contact with the car will be accelerated to car speed. So it's not that with a larger area the force is spread out, there's actually just more places that have force applied. In other words, a low car will break your legs, a high car will break your legs and torso.
Their aggressive, misleading and clickbait ads, particularly as YouTube sponsorships. From my experience the product is fine, but the ads make it seem like their covering up for something.
Podcasts are just a RSS feed with an mp3 downloas link. It's trivial to open the RSS feed in your browser and locate the mp3 download link. Download the mp3, open it in any audio editor, edit out the ad. Or find the folder where your podcast app stores the mp3s and edit them from there.
Personally, I'm OK with podcast ads as there's limited opportunity for tracking or personalization. If we don't encorage podcasts to remain as an open platform, they will be swallowed up by Spotify.
it doesn't actually ever say why they should. It completely ignores that it obviously takes longer to drive across into the other lane and then back than to pass the cyclists
Because it's SAFER. Oh my god, have we really got so selfish that a human life is worth like a second.
But why is it less weird to suck on rotten plant ovaries? That's what alcohol is. Food is fucking weird.