Skip Navigation
I can't help but wonder how my life would be different if mindlessly staring at screens wasn't an option
  • Thanks, I needed that post. I'm in a similar boat. I get addicted to this stuff (YT, lemmy, reddit etc.) easily, and I've found that a moderate use is just not possible for me in the long run. It can't really coexist in my life with leisure activities that require me to sustain my attention for longer, like reading, practicing an instrument, or even just sitting down and listening to a good album intently.

    What helps me a bit is putting all kinds of hindrances in place:

    • storing my phone in a drawer and only taking it out when I want to do something specific
    • not having my router always running, but only turning it on when I want to use the wifi for something specific
    • browser extensions to block certain sites
    • using screen time limits in the Android settings
    • rooting my phone and blocking addictive sites in my hosts file (unfortunately I only found out afterwards that subdomains (*) like m.youtube.com aren't blocked by blocking the main sites like youtube.com and now I can't add them to the blacklist without much effort)
    • (similar solutions for my laptop)

    But none of that has worked as much as I'd like. It's a constant struggle and I'm still looking for a better solution.

    Doing interesting stuff has somehow in my mind turned into work.

    That's the worst part. Scroll too much and that state becomes your new baseline. Now anything that is less captivating and effortless than that feels difficult.

    (*) I'm not sure if subdomain is the correct term here. If anyone knows, please correct me.

  • Math question: how do we get an irrational number pi from the ratio of circumference and the diameter of a circle?
  • I'm kind of dissatisfied with the answers here. As soon as you talk about actually drawing a line in the real world, the distinction between rational and irrational numbers stops making sense. In other words, the distinction between rational and irrational numbers is a concept that describes numbers to an accuracy that is impossible to achieve in real life. So you cannot draw a line with a clearly irrational length, but neither can you draw a line with a clearly rational length. You can only define theoretical mathematical constructs which can then be classified as rational or irrational, if applicable.

    More mathematically phrased: in real life, your line to which you assign the length L will always have an inaccuracy of size x>0. But for any real L, the interval (L-x;L+x) contains both an infinite number of rational and an infinite number of irrational numbers. Note that this is independent of how small the value of x is. This is why I said that the accuracy, at which the concept of rational and irrational numbers make sense, is impossible to achieve in real life.

    So I think your confusion stems from mixing the lengths we assign to objects in the real world with the lengths we can accurately compute for mathematical objects that we have created in our minds using axioms and definitions.

  • Performance: Series S vs. Steam Deck

    Hello :) Has anyone here played CP2077 on both Xbox Series S and the Steam Deck? Because these are the only platforms I have, and I'd like to buy the game for one of them. What I'd like to know specifically is if there are performance differences that significantly affect the gameplay itself, not just graphics. So things like draw distance or framerate dropping so low that it affects how you play, or having less NPCs on the streets. Thanks in advance.

    3
    InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BE
    benni @lemmy.world
    Posts 3
    Comments 47