What if someone gives you a choice, they will kill your children brutally or you kill them and their children as collateral damage?
That is what this is.
Twitter is very much active, it is the first place all political discussions happen. It is where the Israel attacks unfolded. It is where every big figure has an account and share their viewpoints.
It is also where you often see two sides having very different viewpoints argue, something in which it is unique - since by design it tries to allow different ideas even if you don't agree with them.
But not so with Lemmy - which is extremely left centric, and harbours so much hatred against people, censorship, and the ostrich syndrome of burying you head in the sand, that this post to censor Elon and this amazing claim that Twitter is dead gets so much attraction. Case in point how I predict when near 100% accuracy that this comment will be voted down and buried.
I mean yeah. I mean wtf.
I mean, if I install something compiling from source, I would not expect anyone else to manage it, right? I mean why would anyone expect that flatpak snap etc. all get managed automatically, they even forget how they installed something, it is so ridiculous.
It's fine. What she does with her private life is none of our business.
Well I did, but the community in Lemmy is suffocatingly left leaning for me. So I had to go back to Reddit for fresh air. (Never have I thought I'd go back to Reddit because some other community is even more left, but here we are.)
And you are the one talking about drag shows, and started verbal slurs "dipshit".
bankimu
The topic was first amendment. Stay in context. Either acknowledge that it's not a good argument, or accept that they are "the same as drag show" within that context.
Not even sure what the Jesus thing is about, but I suppose everything is being allowed under the pretext of first amendment so why not. It sounds like an enactment which is a - what did people call it - an "art form".
Well then don't! Revenge code which makes it worse for people who actually use Linux isn't a way to do this.
It's sad to see the 100500th confrontation between the people who have never contributed to the kernel, yet they want to deprive others of using their existing GPU with Linux and instead force them to buy a new GPU. This screams of of being elitist and haughty but I just don't care any longer. Too tired of hatred, aggression, animosity and verbal attacks. This has really propelled Linux, oh, wait, it's only shown what kind of people represent Open Source.
If it's a dmca violation then sue them. Do not create software "defenses" and do not make my computer experience worse.
CEO donating to what's cause is ideology that should be separated from you assessment of the product.
I don't care about this, sounds like another Hogwarts fiasco.
Economy is gone, look at the cumulated inflation over the last few years. And depleting Treasury.
I mean if you have so much hatred for your own body that you mutilate it irrevocably and horribly to pretend what you are not, then it's not a healthy thing. Whether in public or private.
Now that women can play women, we don't need that anymore.
Who is banning such shows? Nay, why, let's all also make lap dances and pole dancing available to kids in school. Sure they are art forms and first amendment applies there too. /s
Manjaro is a really good distro to start with. It has very nice defaults including the correct zsh plugins. Should make your transition to Arch whenever the time comes very smooth. It does have a bad reputation because they don't seem to manage it well (e.g. keys keep expiring), and the said defaults are implemented in a very hacky way (if you see the code). Also they follow a delayed release which is really unnecessary given Arch is stable already; and in fact the delay can cause issues if you use AUR (which you will, eventually discover and learn about and love).
Lol yeah not gonna happen.
As SSD is getting cheaper, I find myself keep thinking that I should buy a bigger one.
But this isn't really a decision based on actual need - and I can tell my mind is playing tricks to convince me that "you need to get it because what if you want to install a lot of large games".
I'm thinking may be a reasonable criteria instead is to see my current utilization, and buy one only if the utilization exceeds a percentage - say ">80% disk util=> buy a new one" as a rule?
What is your criteria to get a bigger disk?
As I play Diablo 4, I see it take up ridiculous amount of VRAM, upwards of 20GB.
The game doesn't have very good control over VRAM management, and I think it just doesn't free up any loaded texture if the VRAM size is large.
I use Lutris to run Battle.net client and Diablo.
Is there any way I can limit VRAM available to it from Wine, DXVK, or Lutris?
I have an RTX 2080ti.
I still play in 1080p 60Hz, and the 2080 is plenty. But I'm looking to train some ML models, and the 11GB VRAM is limiting for that.
Thus, I plan to buy a new one. Also I don't want a ML only GPU since I don't want to maintain two GPUs.
Since I'm upgrading, I need to think of future compatibility. At some point I will move to at least 2k, although still I'm not bought into 4k as any perceivable benefit.
Given all these, I wanted to check with folks who have either card, should I consider 4090?
For Kristin Turner and her family, the short-term rental company's ban was as devastating as the appeal process was maddening.
AirBnB bans host for knowing the wrong people, without disclosing who the wrong person was, denies appeals with cookie cutter mails ("after careful consideration") every time.