Turns out the missile in question is an intermediate range nuclear capable missile. So, on one hand it's possible we will see tactical nukes used in Ukraine, but on the other hand it will likely take a few years to get production back up and running after so long of not being in production.

Thanks, I laughed at it and tried to upvote before realizing it was a screenshot lol

Yes that is the joke

They very much are, the actual problem that happened was that audio channels got mixed up on a livestream. It's really not that big of a deal

It's fully free for me for some reason, maybe try clearing cookies to refresh your free articles?

WE CAN DO BOTH!

The future of our energy generation is not a zero sum game, we can simultaneously build out and continuing developing solar, wind, mass storage, and other already proving things while also continuing development on SMR and building large nuclear reactors too. Sure, the nuclear options will take longer to bear fruit but we will likely still be needing more clean energy by the time they do, even with pumping out other renewables as fast as we can.

Wait, you guys have a pirate party over there? That's actually really cool

I wish our parties over here in the states were more interesting like that (also that we have more of them and need a completely different system but that's besides the point)

They still might be forced to follow chromium's manifest v3 ant ad locking stuff though, we'll just have to see.

More like the .1% of the world, but also yes.

In theory it should be mostly fine to touch, idk much about it either unfortunately. it might be a good idea to put some sort of spray on sealer if you will be touching it regularly and are concerned about it at all.

It is definitely dangerous to sand or cut with a saw or something, definitely want to do that outside with gloves and a respirator because then you're getting loose fibers both on you and airborne.

Tldr: Hamas shot some rockets, they got shot down, and Israel killed at least 35 Palestinians in response.

And this should be the thumbnail not the Israelis that were safe the whole time

Well yeah, but the intention is to lessen the effects of the warming already happening and what will happen in the future no matter what we do. Nobody is pretending like we need to do this instead of cutting emissions, (except maybe oil execs I guess), we can do both at once.

The one downside of this and other geoengineering options is that once we start we can't stop until CO2 levels drop back down so we don't get a more sudden global temperature spike which would be worse for the environment most likely

Unless I'm reading it wrong thats exactly what they did, hire a third party, external agency to conduct an investigation. If the complaint is that it's biased because they paid them, then idk what else you wanted them to do. I could understand not fully trusting them still, that's your opinion and choice, but criticizing them for conducting a voluntary third party investigation is a little silly

Bro he was talking about your brain And there is no supercomputer on earth able to even approach it, and regardless supercomputer is a rather relative term tbh

Unfortunately yes, there are unfortunately people out there who would say that unironically.

Granted, they probably wouldn't word it that way but still

Guys it was just a hard landing chill

:O

yes

Honestly I could maybe believe the 20 countries thing because it is highly dependent on what countries those 20 are and there's a lot of tiny countries out there

I think they definitely dropped a kilo somewhere for the numbers they got tho

So I went and looked at the study they linked for that section, and it had the same number and said the same thing. Their citation for it was the EPA greenhouse gas equivalency calculator, but when I plugged the number into it gave me .072 coal plants for a year.

I'm guessing what happened is the study fucked it up somehow and the article blindly copied it.