Not disagreeing. However, it still kind of feels like we're trying to solve wolves to fix a human problem. You know?

You lost me in the last sentence. I think what you said rings true with an exception. I don't believe that the people you're referencing will bother with learning how to care again. It would be a tacit admission that it was willful ignorance.

Pete Buttigieg worked for Mckinsey. Although it appears he's tried to make good in addressing how his time was spent working there, that is a stench that is difficult to wash off. Bias Note: I'm not against Pete, but I'm definitely against Mckinsey.

This one has been easy for me lately: They spell 'lose' as 'loose'.

I'm not a fitness guy. However, I'd assume it's for the same reason you don't press on the gas and the brake at the same time. I could be wrong, however.

Good points, 12 seems to be superior and I've changed my opinion.

I'm not experienced with RPN but at a glance think there's a solid argument for it.

Base 16 is superior and once you learn binary math, easier to divide and multiply.