Thief_of_Crows @ Thief_of_Crows @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

229

Joined

1 yr. ago

I'm glad somebody is doing something useful while the dying American empire flounders around doing genocides.

This is obviously an insane thing to claim, but even if it were to come true, that would mean it's entirely your fault for not turning on genocide Joe months ago. Trying to push a genocider on America is both very foolish and deeply evil. America is a lot of things, but at least so far, we still hate genocide. You would have voted for Hitler. That is a fact, not an opinion.

Not this incumbent, I suggest you read some polls. Biden is probably the only person besides Hillary Clinton that could lose to trump in 2024.

North Korea doesn't have a larger army than USA.

The regions at war have declared independence from Ukraine. It's the same situation as America was in, except that France wasn't trying to make the colonies become french. But they certainly expected a high level of control over them.

Comparing it to WW2 is insane, it's not remotely the same situation.

A rigged election is when you disregard the outcome of the votes. Such as venezualas in 2018 (attempted). All agreed that the votes said Maduro won, but America claimed it was rigged, and thus their puppet actually won. Or if the things trump supporters claimed were actually true, that's a rigged election.

Nobody has ever disseminated the videos Biden claimed to have seen, or verified any of the IDFs claims. Other people claimed to have seen them, and people have claimed anything they can think of about Hamas. None of it has been verified. Believing anything the IDF says at this point is essentially malicious incompetence, nobody who has done research on the topic would actually believe the BS being spewed. Biden is either an idiot for believing it, or lying. I lean towards idiot in this case.

This only works if you're America, and even then only somewhat. Everybody else has to fear other places not valuing their currency as highly.

Counterpoint: this is theft. Counter-counterpoint: still okay because she's a billionaire. But like, imagine waking up as someone normal, and you go and spend all their money. That'd be fucked up.

Why would I ever do it with men unless I'm talking to someone who's into men?

I mean, she's unattractive enough that I'd consider not going on a 2nd date if I wasn't into her on the 1st. Where like a supermodel or whatever, I'd put up with not liking them for several months if she's into me.

Blue moon is a terrible choice if you intend to have more than half of one. Just get a loaf of bread and dip it in a keystone Ice, it'll taste better and have less wheat.

But then you lose great puns, which are half the reason English is such a great language. Consider "American Idiot":

Welcome to a new kind of tension All across the alien nation Where everything isn't meant to be okay.

The song works significantly better by using a pun, to say that it's a nation of the alienated.

Nothing they had written was incorrect, on a site the size of Wikipedia, adding more true but functionally useless pages is only ever a (very minor) benefit. If there were only 1000 pages, sure, it'd be clutter. But it is already the case that to find anything you have to search for it, meaning it is a net positive to create those pages.

If it was a corporation, absolutely. It's part of the risks they're taking on as a business. But for a government, which is by definition non profit, you kinda have to mandate return of the funds. Otherwise the government as a whole could collapse.

I mean, I believe the side not allied with a country known to rig elections and openly spread propaganda about their victims. Recently the US president claimed to have personally seen videos of Hamas beheading babies, which never existed. Russia spreads propaganda internally too, but historically only about internal affairs, not shit like claiming Venezuelas election was rigged in order to install a puppet.

Obviously using larger army as a metric doesn't make sense in the long term. It only works in spots where you've already committed to a war.

Saying it wasn't a legit election because Russian soldiers were there is stupid. That can just as easily be used as proof that it was legitimate. I'm sure Britain looked like the peaceful side during the US revolution as well, does that make France the bad guys in that war?

Raccoons and corvids? What, in the 30 minutes after they defeated the crabs, but before they evolved into crabs themselves?

Yes. Why would anyone think otherwise based on logic?

It's important as context for understanding why one is a genocide and the other isn't

I'm pretty obviously not a bot, this is next level cope.

Let the UN stop them then. America can't afford to be the world police.

What happens is the other 90% of Ukraine will be fine, and Crimea will be Russian.