I gotta start going to bars 😅
Finally, some good fucking [regulations on predatory games]
They were called out for using they/them in cases with no ambiguity, as in, there was a known desired pronoun and they used they/them instead
literally vanguardism
The important distinction is what it means for it to "be clear". Unless someone has indicated what their pronouns are, using they/them for everyone is the polite option. But if you're using he/him for strangers just because they're "clearly a cis man", you're now imposing a transphobic bias on those whom you use they/them
1.4k in Attila
Attila really was a fcking legend. The reversed start of collapsing empire and the actual need to supplicate before the might of the Huns 😭
shaving your head is a one-step aging neutralizer. You will be of indeterminate age from 28-60, depending on skincare and genetics
To be fair, they probably meant "this year, you reached 915 days with us"
Ughhhhh I had the exact same experience. It made me feel so bad for having to go to a tutorial after feeling so accomplished from sussing everything else out. And then finding out it was a slight platforming error just left me frustrated with myself and the near perfection of that game
If he was purely expressing emotional vulnerability about the loss of his uncle in an otherwise nonadversarial conversation, probably.
If the context included anything about war, politics, military, or even just anything other than his mourning the loss of a family member, heck no.
What do you mean by "protected under the law"? And what constitutes disruptive protest?
I would LOVE this. Especially if the war of the ring or other plot was on-going and you could participate as you pleased, potentially shifting the balance one way or the other. The idea of an open world RPG where the world exists and evolves with or without you is my dream. Mount and Blade is almost that, but for being too army/strategy/overworld focused, and the lord of the rings mod for warband had me hooked for a long time before the limitations got to me
That's all fair, but framing the sequence of events as entirely unilateral action by the AfD is just as slanted as the article, and we're better than that.