Probably because this country is a shit hole. There's nothing to do, and what little there is costs far too much money. Even a visit to the local costs a small fortune.
Yes, like Palestine. I don't believe that was in doubt.
You are absolutely right, it doesn't give them a right to wage war on the Palestine people. Although Israel can and should 'defend' itself, it has gone way too far, killing thousands of innocents for no apparent gain. It is a disgusting over use of force and should quite rightly be condemned.
I would argue however that Israel isn't a colony of Europe or the US, that would imply control over the country and as has been quite apparent, Israel is making it's own decisions and will happily shrug off any criticism from the Western powers. Using words like colony just derails the narrative you want to imply. It is a country created after the second world war (rightly or wrongly) and the horrors of the Holocaust. Does that excuse Israel now? No, absolutely not. If anything I should think they should know better.
Israel needs regime change and a willingness to work with those that surround them and the same goes for Hamas. Religion, ideology, ethnicity, it's all an excuse so easily used to justify violence and unfortunately I don't ever see it changing.
I mean, Jewish people originally heralded from around the eastern Mediterranean, middle east? That would make them historically middle eastern rather than western. Or are we strictly talking about western powers giving the Jewish people a 'homeland' after the second world war and the holocaust?
Not denying anything. Not my problem if you don't know the answer.
Let's assume your narrative is true. Where is Charles in the decision making process?
Ketchup on hotdogs is good. Wear your battlescar with pride.
Owned by the French state toboot.
It doesn't. It fits his narrative, nothing more.