If you mean printing weapons, I really doubt that would help a lot in getting access to female hospital wards, homeless shelters, bathrooms, domestic abuse centres, and so on.
A symptom for sure. She's just a kids writer, nobody would pay her any attention if she was a communist. She's being boosted exactly because she's a TERF.
The Donbass is a territory unique from others in the region.
Doesn't make it a nation.
I also believe that when two cultures come together, Russian and Ukrainian for example, that this creates a unique culture where traditions from both become mixed together.
Sure, this is basically what Cossacks were, with some influence from nations of Caucasus; there were even some calls for independence.
However this is not what happened in Donbass, ask anyone in Donbass what is their nationality and they will either say Russian or Ukrainian.
No worries at all, this reads completely civil. :)
Great points about control over resources, I think you're right here, this is clearly not the priority for Russia.
CPRF is bigger than Social-Democrats were in Lenins times. I know they won't try and bring the war home to turn it into a revolution, but I think they absolutely could if a Lenin shows up (cause Zyuganov is evidently not it).
For the Russian people and the Russian soldier this is an anti-fascist struggle.
OK this is a bit much. Russia has been a hotbed for Nazism since the 90s putting even the likes of Poland to shame. Travel guides to Russia have to warn people of colour to stay in hotels on Adolf Hitlers birthday cause Russian neonazis murder people year after year to celebrate the date.
Ukraine somehow managed to out-Nazi Russia after Maidan but still, the idea that Putin invaded Ukraine to fight Nazism is laughable cause he never had any issues with Nazis in Russia.
The problem is that at this point, it has become very hard to separate the Bandera cult and the russophobia from Ukrainian identity.
That's just Great-Russian chauvinism. Sorry but you're parroting the most reactionary Russian propaganda, like this piece which openly states de-nazification of Ukraine is necessarily also de-Ukrainization: https://ria.ru/20220403/ukraina-1781469605.html
I can't agree with that. Even Nazi Germany didn't need to be de-Germanized after the WW2, you only had to change the system and you got DDR.
I'm not sure I follow, what is so specific to Galicia in the current Ukrainian national identity? How is it different from Ukrainian identity of the UkrSSR?
It seems to me Ukrainian Nazis did the same thing Nazis do everywhere - take a national identity and slap some hatred on top. In this case, Bandera cult and russophobia. Remove that and you're back to just... Regular Ukrainians. Am I missing something?
Revolutionary defeatism isn’t the idea that communists should want Russia to lose every war. Its wanting your capitalist government to lose the war so you can turn it into a civil war.
Everyone in this thread agrees communists in the West should facilitate their governments defeat. The only disagreement is whether Russian communists should practice defeatism or not.
If you are Russian then yes you should want Russia to lose in Ukraine
There is no nation of Hong Kong, they are Han Chinese. There is no nation of Donbass, they are Russians and Ukrainians. The way you're trying to read that quote from Lenin, every single town, every village, every district is a nation. That's not at all what Lenin said.
Tibet does have it's own language, territory, and culture, and so it is indeed a nation.
It is quite apparent that you don’t understand Ukraine, its national-ethnic composition or its history.
language, culture and historical national conception of a minority in the far West of Ukraine.
OK this is laughable. I was raised in Ukraine and I don't need a Westerner to tell me I don't understand it, especially one who seems to think Ukrainians are "a minority in the far West of Ukraine".
There is a continuum of culture and language in Ukraine going from East to West.
I'm aware, thanks. The way I've been taught, Dnipro marks the border between Eastern Ukraine, which was always under Russian influence, and Western Ukraine, which had significant Polish influence and cultural ties. But the same goes for Russia. Ukrainian language was spoken all the way to the Don, the Cossack dialect has strong Ukrainian influence, and really entire Southern Russia is a mixture of Ukrainian, Georgian, Abkhasian, Ingush, Circassian, and other influences. Where exactly is the "ethnically and historically correct" border between Ukraine and Russia? I have no idea, maybe it's along Dnipro, maybe it's along Don, or anywhere in between.
Where is the legally correct border between Ukraine and Russia? That's much easier, that was peacefully agreed in 1991. Should Ukraine pursue a return to those borders? Fuck no, that ship has sailed and it's time for Ukraine to cut its losses and accept whatever peace it can have.
Your post with date-by-date history of the lead up to this conflict is spot on and I'm aware of those events. They still don't justify invading a brotherly nation. Again, having been raised in the USSR I can't support Russia's wars on its neighbours, even if the fault lies mostly with the West.
Look at China, it manages to maintain sovereignty without killing large numbers of people in Hong Kong or Taiwan, and without waging wars on internal separatists like in Xinjiang.
No, the DPR and LPR are not nations, they never claimed that, they consider themselves part of the Russian nation, as did much of Ukraine to some degree before the Ukrainan nationalist re-education project began post 1991
Again, having grown up in Ukraine in the 80s, I can assure you people living there considered themselves Ukrainian, even Russian speakers like me.
![Red_Scare [he/him]](https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/99ba5d86-bb50-4296-b405-3267b413b844.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
Isn't it basically petty bourgeoisie + labour aristocracy?