Red_Scare [he/him] @ Red_Scare @lemmygrad.ml

Posts

15

Comments

194

Joined

5 yr. ago

Awesome story!

Duke / King of Wu are the same person in the story.

King of Wu had an opportunity to kill king of Yue but instead chose to be merciful and it ended badly for him, now king of Yue has an opportunity to kill king of Wu so he should take it or else it he might repeat king of Wu fate.

From what I know, it’s rediculous disinformation to try and make the connection between regime-change NGOs and students.

Diana writes the protest leader "learned organizing skills in numerous programs and workshops funded by Western foundations" and both his parents are prominent NGO leaders so it does sound like he was groomed and educated to become a regime change actor, you don't get a more direct connection than that...

Reminds me a bit of how it turned out Joshua Wong took part in some "leadership development course" organised by NED, read regime change training, before orgnising the protests.

Just happens to be the same person who insisted on calling Ukraine "Nazikraine", claimed Ukraine never existed and isn't a nation, and that Nazism is the core of Ukrainian national identity. What a coincidence.

Thank you! I'm planning a trip there so wondered how disruptive the protests are cause going with a small child.

Thank you! Could you comment on this article?

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/05/27/diana-johnstone-serbias-organized-chaos/

Honestly I was just thinking exactly the same thing. They will make it unliveable for people and blame it on Russia, and then make them chose, "so do you want peace or welfare? Cause you can't have both" and we'll watch the support for the war skyrocket cause Brits are so used to leaching off other countries they believe it's their manifest destiny.

How was your trip? Are protests visibly affecting regular life, infrastructure, transport?

Thank you for this.

Thank you comrade.

Thank you! Do you know what the protests are even supposed to be about? All I could find was "anti-corruption" which is vague as shit and reminds me of Navalny who somehow fought "corruption" by calling to exterminate immigrants like cockroaches...

Yeah it does look this way, thank you very much comrade.

Thank you!

Which UK political party would you recommend joining? I've been circling around CPB hoping they drop their TERF stance but that doesn't seem to be happening any time soon: https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/communist-party-and-young-communist-league-welcome-supreme-court-ruling-definition

Please do elaborate!

@ComradePupIvy would likely be interested too but I'm tech illiterate and can't figure out how to @ them.

BTW is this a good article on them? https://www.ebb-magazine.com/essays/inside-the-last-days-of-the-cpgb-ml

CPGB-ML are so, so much worse than TERFs. CPB (and WPUK they keep supporting) are TERFs.

CPGB-ML are against any and all "LGBT ideology" and they will expell members for it. They are against all "identity politics" with very narrow exceptions for women's rights and anti-racism.

I can't find it now but there was a tweet on their official account comparing gay rights to guide dogs for the blind in an attempt to drive home just how frivolous gay rights are, arguing those are not class issues but special group interests - and alienating everyone who cares about either queer liberation or disability justice in one fell swoop.

They are not just tailist, they are full on right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc), and I will die on this hill. They also collaborate with US patsocs and promote them.

Nazbols / patsocs pretend to be Marxist-Leninists and there are always some people around ML spaces who sympathise with them. There's nobody here who thinks NYT present the correct Marxist-Leninist line.

If this was posted as "Inteview with Joti Brar the patsoc TERF" I wouldn't report it, alas it's posted as:

Joti Brar of CPGB-ML is the daughter of the late Harpal Brar.

“Neutrality Studies” is some Swiss nonsense, but at least they’ll listen to communists and anti-imperialists.

I could say all those things about the BBC, the Guardian, etc, and yet there's no rule against posting them. I already explained why I think right deviationists in particular are banned, I might be wrong, I didn't wright those rules this is just how I understand them. This is also what makes sense to me, I think banning New York Times is counterproductive but banning Haz is not.

I wonder if you didn’t know this or if you are intentionally minimizing this.

Are you for real? Lol fuck right off

There are many people speaking against russophobia and warmongering, we don't need to post the ones who also speak against "the gays".

When writing the effort post above I skimmed over that RATWM article again, and this stood out to me: "considering the people most impacted by US imperialism and imperialist war have been organizing against it long before these Mises people came along, why haven’t I seen most of these white Latte Leftists engaged in organizing with us? I mean, Black, queer, trans, disabled, Global South, African people will certainly all die should there be a nuclear war"

There are better voices to lift out of obscurity than Joti's.