Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
1
Comments
728
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • we used to be fine with candles and stinky lanterns filled with perfectly good kerosene too. who tf needs electricity? 🤨

    on the topic of family connection, I can't speak to your family experience. only my own. and our family group chat is pretty damn active.

  • Spam prevention? Ive got spam on Signal. Having your phone number be the barrier of entry doesn't make Signal a flawless app.

    and considering i can just plug a google voice number in, I'm not sure its the best barrier.

  • Signal is not capable of SMS and quite a lot of people still use it.

    yes, i know SMS isn't secure at all. but if the option is "keep in touch with close family" or "don't keep in touch" they will probably choose the former if they want to keep that.

  • using the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.

    there's no real need for it any longer.

  • so keep this instance as it was originally intended and make a new rule about jkrowling posts going to their appropriate instance.

    seems an easy solution that doesn't require so much spread.

  • oh I disabled my "smart" TV's ability to connect to the internet. its a dumb TV now.

    it made the mistake of showing me a banner ad while I was gaming. so I promptly cut its balls off in retaliation.

  • exactly. so I'm wondering what the purpose is for its need.

    (edit: apologies- the phone number. needing the phone number.)

  • if they need my phone number to have an account anyway, they can offer both.

    i dont need more apps that do the same thing. i need less.

  • ironically, replacing shitty clickbait journalists is something AI can and will likely do in the near future.

  • i love this cat

  • this is an ad, guys. look at the history.

    quite unfortunate.

  • signal requires a phone number and won't even allow you to send sms to those that aren't on signal.

    its better, but still not great.

  • oooooh that is very interesting. thank you for that.

  • ...yes you are extremely confused and apparently didn't read my comment fully.

    because that's what I said. lol

  • third party games. that's what the article is talking about. and what I am talking about.

  • well... yeah. nobody wants to buy a full price game that they already own on steam that they got on sale 3 years ago.

    why would they? the only people those games are marketed for are nintendo exclusive users who have no other game platform.

    the world spins regardless of if nintendo decides to put out a new overpriced console or not. if they're getting left behind, the world will continue to spin.

  • Mudita Kompakt

    Jump
  • addiction isnt something to pay 440 for. addiction is something to work on yourself or with someone who specializes in mental health.

    i have experienced addiction. smart phone addiction is a mild one and its completely breakable by changing one's own habits.

    people are capable of it. they're just lazy. shelling out 440 bucks for a gimmick that makes them feel like they're helping themselves doesn't seem like a healthy thing to do for one's addiction.

  • Mudita Kompakt

    Jump
  • 440 dollars for a bad smartphone and the homepage of this site is some guy sitting in a yoga pose to make the company seem more 🙏zen🙏.

    people need to start exercising personal discipline rather than spending 440 bucks for a device with less features when you could just uninstall the crap you're tired of

    you can "dumb" down a smart phone literally at will. at any time. or just put the thing down more often.

    that won't cost you 440 dollars so some random guy can buy expensive yoga mats to pose on, and you'll be better off for teaching yourself better smartphone use habits.

  • Mudita Kompakt

    Jump
  • honestly the target audience is young 20 somethings. older folks like me grew up having to use different methods to keep stuff together. address book/cassette player/CD player/date book.

    but then the smart phone happened and suddenly even mp3 players were obsolete. so us older folks embraced the functionality of a device we once needed an entire bags worth of stuff to replicate from our youth. I've never looked back from the smartphone because I remember actually carrying all that stuff.

    these younger people were born when tech was getting to that point. and their formative years were spent with smart devices. so their brains seem wired to want to break "free" from it.

    or at least thats just my theory. the 'iPad kid' generation is starting to be adults and they've not had the distance between smart devices that the older generations have.

    again, just my take on it.

  • I'm not sure who greenlit that headline, but good lord that is like word barf.