It happened to me once, and only because a player wanted to do some stupid shit.
It was still an okayish character.
The others played what sounded cool to them and had no issues.
Relative to pf1 it's night and day
But it's really fucked up that they never change anything.
Fortunately for the viewer every "villain" kicks a puppy at some point making every social criticism invalid.
??? Have you ever played 2e?
That shit is perfectly balanced.
Just because fights are designed around having full hp doesn't mean the players always are.
In pf1 you can ruin a character with an uninformed choice, in pf2 you can't. The gap between minmaxxed or not has become reasonable in my opinion.
Lmao, I think you confused pf1 and pf2.
In pf1 you can build yourself into a corner and create useless characters with ease.
In 2e the worst characters are still decent
It's a better version of Uno for me. It has a bit more options and variants for players and leans into the funny stuff more than Uno ever did.
Fun game for casual players to not play Uno
I think I'll write down the basics of Tokyo Nova and see what I might add and change.
A hand system is pretty high on that list. I am not sure if I'll add a Blackjack mechanic for skill checks against others, what do you think?
My basic idea is that every player plays poker with themselves in a passive way, ie every time they draw a card, they add it to their open ones and when they have 5 open cards, they get an advantage depending on their best combination, like in poker
But that's valid criticism. Rules have to justify their existence