@lig
On several levels, but especially because of this : https://toad.social/@davetroy/113493454665487197
@EssenceofMeh
Neither did I. It could become really useful for the whole #Fediverse.
@rglullis
@buru5 @fediverse , I guess the best answer to the question is on their site : https://writefreely.org/about
@Valmond
Another important quote : https://kbin.social/m/threads/t/708169
@xigoi
@Valmond
According to what I've read, they haven't implemented yet but you'll have to opt in in the settings of a threads account to be seen on the Fediverse. In other words, it won't be possible to interact unintentionnally with the Fediverse. So, Fediversians will be in a state of complaining in case of bad behaviours coming from Threads.
https://kbin.social/u/@mosseri@threads.net
@xigoi @fediverse
@Creatortray
You've just written it : their negative reputation for easaly understandable reasons. We can already foresee Threads will very soon be used to spread the most toxic campaigns on the net and that will undoubtably harm the Fediverse. One of the most valuable trait of the Fediverse is its decentralization and consequently, the potential accountability of any server administrator. Why should we take those risks when it's so easy to avoid it? #BlockThreadsOut
@mypasswordis1234
@Adanisi
I suppose it refers to Threads. Not so far from treason. So, we can call Threadiverse the gathering of betrayers who use Threads as if it were a part of the Fediverse.
@ieightpi @fediverse