Ou pas en fait c'est pas une coalition qui choisie le PM, c'est le président.
Macron il veut juste pas choisir quelqu'un et prendre le risque de ce prendre une motion de censure. Il refuse la responsabilité qui est la sienne en faisant croire que c'est aux députés de se mettre d'accord.
Macron il peut nommer qui il veut 1er ministre donc il fait du Macron en essayant de casser le NFP et en voulant créer une coalition parlementaires a droite.
Lors des élections dont tu parles la question ne s'était pas posée, car la majorité parlementaire était net a chaque fois.
Le barrage républicain sert a éviter que le RN/FN ne soit élu, pas a dicter des décisions de constitution du gouvernement.
1/ I just gave one example of monetisation that is working with peertube as it is now.
2/ And I explain briefly why most replies make the link with monetisation and ads.
I didn't make any assumption in 1, I answer the question : monetisation on peertube is possible right now. In 2, I assume Op didn't understand why people react often as if monetisation was equal to ads. But I didn't assume Op was talking about that specifically, because if I was I wouldn't have suggested an alternative monetisation system in 1 in the first place.
Lastly, you used the word crazy about me two sentences in a row, on a two sentences post. Chill.
I would say that the comparison hit a wall here. It seems that there is nothing between pushing a button to get money and learning how peertube is coded and is working internally for you...
To be fair to YouTube creators, pushing a button isn't enough to make you money in most cases.
There is 2 things here:
1_ you want to make and host video.
2_ you want to make videos and make money with it.
In case 1 you don't care about money, so there is no problem. In case 2 you want money, to me if you want money you should know how to make money with the tools you have (or use other tools if needed). I agree that with Peertube it's harder to move from case 1 to case 2 easily as it is with YouTube.
But the main focus of YouTube in the last years is not sharing content but making money. As I was saying Peertube is a video host software not a tool to make money with videos. It isn't build with this goal set as the primary one.
Well if you don't know how to operate a car, you should not drive. If you don't know the basics, you won't be able to do small repairs yourself. If you don't know nothing about cars at all, you will likely have to paid more than someone with more knowledge to obtain the same result.
Ask any cab if he just pays and doesn't know anything about cars.
If you're a video creator who wants to make money with your videos, you should be knowledgeable about monetisation and video making. Don't be lazy, it's just your job.
Because YouTube wants you to not think, but just provide content and shut up.
Peertube (libre softwares in generals) requires to think about things and to make choices by yourself. It doesn't try to be more than what it is = a tool for easily host videos.
Because anyone with a computer can host a peertube instance. Therefore is you want your videos on peertube it will cost you nothing more than what you already have : a computer running and an internet access.
The only real barrier is having the time and the knowledge to set it up.
Peertube is tech solution to host video, not a way to make money with videos.
Monetisation can be done with peertube, but it's up to creators to set it up.
Ça oui, on peut limiter la porté de l'alinéa 3.
En l'occurrence la loi sur les retraites est passé comme une loi de financements donc effectivement, la question est comment éviter le shutdown et limiter les abus ?
Noo @ Navigator @jlai.lu Posts 2Comments 165Joined 1 yr. ago
The Wreck