Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MI
MisanthropiCynic @ MisanthropiCynic @lemm.ee
Posts
0
Comments
58
Joined
3 wk. ago

  • Just because it is in range doesn’t mean it’s appropriate

    It was the wrong calibre for what he was doing. The wrong platform for his objective.

    I can but 4” clay pigeons at 50m with a 9mm pistol but I should use something else.

  • No. Even that limitation is unconstitutional. Look up the actual convictions and appeal rates for them

    The most recent one is just a couple of months old where a guy threatened Kevin McCarthy, the House speaker, over 100 times on the phone and he only got probation because the judge knew the prison sentence wouldn’t withstand appeal.

  • I thought you were replying to me at first, but it just reaffirm what I said so now it looks like you were replying to someone else maybe

    The ruling reaffirmed that the government cannot punish speech just because it is offensive or upsetting, reinforcing strong protections for free speech under the First Amendment.