Marcbmann @ Marcbmann @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

166

Joined

2 yr. ago

Honestly, it extends beyond creative works.

OpenAI should not be held back from subscribing to a research publication, or buying college textbooks, etc. As long as the original works are not reproduced and the underlying concepts are applied, there are no intellectual property issues. You can't even say the commercial application of the text is the issue, because I can go to school and use my knowledge to start a company.

I understand that in some select scenarios, ChatGPT has been tricked into outputting training data. Seems to me they should focus on fixing that, as it would avoid IP issues moving forward.

I honestly work at a company that would fit most ideals for the average anti-work/work-reform subscriber.

Unlimited PTO, with minimum PTO usage requirements. Free medical. They pay for my gym membership. They pay for tampons for my household. Full time remote. I hold equity in the company. Annual performance bonuses. And they disclose the financials of just about everything to employees. It's pretty wild

The issue is simply reproduction of original works.

Plenty of people mimic the style of other artists. They do this by studying the style of the artist they intend to mimic. Why is it different when a machine does the same thing?

Nah, we document every fuck up, and sit him down for a come to Jesus moment

My time management is great. I do my job and the job of the person underneath me, because we can't find anyone worth a damn.

Yeah, plenty of companies have demonstrated a willingness to do things other than grin and bear it

It's just shit posting.

That's a weird take. The shopping part is provided to you for free for your convenience. Not returning the shopping cart means you are creating a nuisance for other people who are coming to the store to get the things that they need. It is blocking parking spots, potentially going to damage somebody's car, and no longer in a centralized location.

Not returning it is inconsiderate in multiple ways.

Not much. Reddit was left leaning, but Lemmy is liberal as fuck. I consider myself left leaning, but I can't stand the political bias here

I thought it was weird at first. Now I don't even notice it.

It looks like you're just so engrained with hate for Musk that you're literally denying reality.

Lmao, yeah, let's just let everyone join the unemployment line together. Big brain moves.

So because the execs suck ass, everyone should lose their jobs instead of a fraction of the employees. Genius move.

How do you expect a business to run? Every major business decision go to a vote? Or should a company that is bleeding cash not lay off anyone until the company shuts down and everyone is out of a job?

I was at Home Depot trying to get a gas powered hedge trimmer. I have almost an acre of property, and there are tons and tons of bushes around the house.

Salesman says I should buy electric. I tell him yes, but I'd have to buy another battery or two just so I can do all the work in one day. Which makes it significantly more expensive than gas.

"Ah that's the thing. You just replace everything with electric, and you get a battery with each device!"

Okay, so, what if I want to cut the grass, do the edging, and trim the hedges in one day? I understand the need to switch to electric and reduce emissions. But the number of towns banning gas powered lawn care equipment is just ignoring the obvious. Electric is simply not practical for anyone with a remotely large property.

It's worse than you think. As an advertiser, I can actually buy targeted product placements in shows. So, let's say I'm Google, and I know you recently searched for a Google Pixel. If I pay for product placements in the next Prime show, I can get all the phones to be Pixels when you watch it.

But if your friend searched for an iPhone, and he gets targeted by apple, the phones in the show could be iPhones.

Nah, most of it is coming from Alibaba, but at a markup.

SpaceX has paid for starlink through selling flights on their rockets, not through "subsidies like this"

You seem confused if you're flip flopping between starlink being paid for by consumers and subsidies.

After 5 years.

SpaceX sells services. Just because they're selling services to the government doesn't make it a subsidy.

People will keep down voting you, but I just wanted to stop in and let you know that there are other people like you who can read.

People on Lemmy are leftist AF and their seething hate for Musk clouds their ability to think.