MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him] @ MLRL_Commie @hexbear.net

Posts

0

Comments

102

Joined

5 mo. ago

I would guess there is also a threshold for size for such shapes, because the soil formations start to become a dominant factor of such crater shapes at some point. But whether that point is at like 0.5kg or at 100kg I have no clue.

Cool fact about the NASA dude though

Not really, it's just that this info is then translated incorrectly into "they have captured everything behind them" for example, when it could just be loose fighters moving forward but not establishing any occupation behind them.

That's just an example, but the sources are all talking in points and moments, and then articles and analysts keep translating that to fronts and establishments. It's not entirely incorrect, but the dynamics are just way off if the analysts are wrong. The fog of war isn't just lies, it's also these sorts of translations of facts to "bigger" facts. Lots is lost

Then why 40??? Because 45 was winning and you are almost there? Was 45 used to indicate advantage then??

What was the purpose of this then? Seems to me like an ok strategy if the goal of the Zionist entity is to retreat, save face in retreat, and continue terror of bombing without needing boots on the ground. That won't win them anything in the long run, but it's what the Zionist entity often does.

Documenting Zionist soldier deletions. Just a list of "RIPiss" moments

You would actually recommend it??? I thought it was just a toy-selling grift. It has positive aspects?

Didn't the Charizard-looking one at some point just turn into a big scary skeleton too?

Just looked it up, skull graymon did exist. The whole phenomenon feels like a fever dream, where I vaguely heard of this and saw random episodes in my youth, but had no fuckin clue what was happening. Every time it comes up in conversation online, I remember some weird shit about it, look it up, and am always surprised that it really was real.

Damn I thought this was about football/soccer and every phrase got more and more confusing. Took "timeouts" for me to remember that American football works like that and that makes your confusing comment just normal and sensible.

They get Chinese-made commodities, technology, and infrastructure projects. It's absolutely a win-win for everyone involved but its long term effect is making the US leverage over countries weaker.

The US can of course can attempt to make this illegal by sanctioning the use of the dollar in this way, but that speeds up the loss of use of the dollar because its reliability will faulter

The bastards changed it to something less fun

The Ukrainian air force said the missile was fried from the Russian region of Astrakhan, more than 700 km (435 miles) from Dnipro in central-eastern Ukraine. It did not specify what kind of warhead the missile had or what type of missile it was. There was no suggestion it was nuclear-armed.

Shit I'm too late to the party, but Banjo Tooie soundtrack runs through my mind constantly. Glitter Gulch Mine was my shit you ever heard a donkey used as an instrument? Well now you have

You didn't do an analogy. You just used Pussy as a demeaning phrase in a way relevant to how women are stereotyped, namely, as 'weak'. We have a problem of misogyny on Hexbear, don't contribute to it. The SPD are spineless and visionless assholes. Look at that phrase, full of alliteration.

Just call them spineless, no misogyny here. It's not even more useful or descriptive. Although the lack of 3 symbols makes me slightly doubtful of what you intended to say.

It's like the US's response to the Iranian "SpongeBob critique" was "Nuh uh, we have tv grifters who really exist, too"

Are those the ghosts haunting europe on the right?

I wasn't criticizing you or your joke or something, your joke was funny. Just wanted to highlight how funny it is that the only unrealistic part was China's response. The rest is sadly believable.

I think the most unrealistic part of this is that China retaliates with military force to sanctions. The rest is much more believable lol

Good question, I would also love to know if any more information was divulged/came out. I honestly just forgot about it

I read this article a while ago, super useful. The entire time, the author was wrestling with very real conditions, with material reality, but had such an obvious idealistic position with respect to social conditions that it was honestly funny to read. The conclusions about DEI honestly just came from nowhere, with absolutely no reason, in the middle of an article that could otherwise be considered good analysis.

But this is what happens when investors want to know realistically what's happening: the advisors aren't going to lie because that will hurt their business. So they do a good analysis. But a step further (the 'and why is it so') is just nonsense again