Oh that's adorable!
It seems like every user on annihilation.social is a racist idiot, and indeed seems to be the entire purpose of that instance. Who do we talk to about starting a discussion on defederation so that they can't use lemmy.world to spread their vile hatred?
For example, one is referencing the Protocols of the Elders of Zion like it's a true thing and the other is talking about how God hates race mixing.
I have reported them.
The mods only care about banning people who make conservatives face reality.
They're not going to ban this chode because they want him for a user.
Nobody cares.
Fuck off, racist POS.
Funny how you're more charitable to this white supremicist's views than you are for anyone to your left.
Last time we were having a discussion you misrepresented my views with every reply, but you've really dialed in the various flavors of racist, because those nuances are so important to understand.
Conservatives will ally with racists and fascists before they compromise with a lib.
The mods have the power to ban anyone.
Notably, they don't ban the guy who hosts a blog with articles titled things like Being White: The Gradual Epiphany of a True Believer and thinks the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a true conspiracy.
I've been banned for some pretty stupid shit, but this guy is welcome. That should tell you everything you need to know about this community.
I don't make excuses for white supremicists.
Guess you do.
How the fuck is a "racial separatist" not a racist?
Gotta love how this community puts the full depravity of conservatism on display for everyone.
You're talking to a white supremicist.
Their site makes it clear.
That's the reason they're citing a racist conspiracy theory.
The mods won't ban him though, because that's the kind of user they wish to court.
It should be said that "news" sites like this are a common right-wing grift: sell a story in the headline that that angry reactionaries will click on to get that hit of indignant rage.
If you think about the stories for five seconds, they fall apart; but clickfarms like the one in the link know that conservatives will spread incendiary headlines like this without even a shred of skepticism.
Their business model depends on it, and they're eating very well.
They're also a white supremicist who wrote an article on their site called Whites Going Their Own Way. (Use archive.org if you dive in yourself so that you're not giving them ad revenue.)
Shocking that they've found a home in this community.
What a smart thought-terminating cliche.
You have so much to teach us.
How about getting people the help they need to deal with those issues that you mentioned instead of throwing them in a cage and making it harder for them to be a productive member of society?
Then I assume the only ways you can think the government can spend money is either giving it directly or arresting people.
What was that about simplistic solutions again?
I meant exactly what I said.
You can always go back and reread it if you're confused.
I'd love if you point out where I said that.
Cool. Glad you contributed that. I had no idea that people had reasons for being homeless.
A simplistic solution is having people live on the streets. That's what we already do.
I really have no idea why you thought to verbalize that.
Imagine if instead of spending a fortune incarcerating people we use it to make it so people didn't have to resort to this kind of desperation.
I'm sure that we can arrest our way out of homelessness though! We just haven't tried hard enough.
It's a common thread linking all of conservatism: they stand against the emancipation of oppressed minorities.
The southern slaveholders considered themselves conservatives, as do those demanding the ongoing genocide in Palestine.
It's also worth noting that you're pointing out the actions of the leader of the Republican party, while OP talks about one powerless dumbass (I think? The original post was removed so IDK).
What's the matter, can dish it out but can't take it?