This community doesn't allow AI art, but I think this post would fit perfectly in !lewd_ai.

I think so, but all the stuff posted prior to the ban is still available.

I haven't seen lolibooru.moe mentioned yet.

Is this community limited only to lewd images or are AI chatlogs allowed too? I previously told someone I'd post one of mine but I don't have anywhere to put it since that post has now been deleted. Is that allowed here or should it be somewhere else?

If you want the angle brackets to appear, you can't put your prompt in a code block. It's a Lemmy bug.

I wish I could get gens with witty text. For now I have to rely on my own grey matter!

For some reason, this post crashes my mobile app. It could be the huge resolution of the bonus images?
I do appreciate the efficient compression though :)

The player could describe what they saw, but nobody except the GM knows if it's true.

It's equally plausible that the paladin failed the check and saw a monster when there was only a dog, or that they passed the check and saw a monster because there was in fact a monster. Their argument to the party would be the same in either case: "that's no dog, it's a space station monster".

The party then must question who saw the correct thing. Did the paladin actually see something everyone else missed? Or are they just seeing things? My point was that the players should not immediately be able to discern the truth. I find that this kind of uncertainty breeds intrigue!

I've never actually played, so this might be standard practice anyway, but I think this would be a great time to have the DM roll privately for each player and not tell them if they passed or failed. If the players only know what their character saw (and not if they pass or fail the check, or even get an idea based on the roll) then metagaming is impossible. This could produce a situation where it's just a dog but the paladin thinks they saw a monster because they failed the roll, or it could be the other way around.
Doing it with DM-only rolls ensures the players have to actually figure out what they saw rather than knowing based on what they rolled or if they passed.

As I said, this could be standard practice, I have no idea. But I hope it is.

If elves age slower than humans (roughly 10x slower in most fantasy settings), is she actually 100 years old? Hmm.

There's just something about girls who hold rulers to their bodies like that...

Peekaboo

This seems like actual art. The hands aren't great, but they also aren't as bad as AI hands.

If she's unable to move after casting explosion, can she give consent? 🤔

But what would the taste be? 🤔

I suppose that would explain why it's hiding!

We kinda do already! !pregnanthentai@burggit.moe isn't specifically for lolis but it definitely allows them, so I don't see the point in a separate new community when this one already exists.

There's a few other similar images by this artist. It might be worth adding them to this post!

Yes.

Artist is most likely aki99