Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LN
LeninWeave [none/use name] @ LeninWeave @hexbear.net
Posts
3
Comments
133
Joined
4 yr. ago

  • Amnesty International USA reacted by issuing a correction, with executive director John Healey subsequently accusing the Bush administration of "opportunistic manipulation of the international human rights movement"...

    How dare they opportunistically manipulate us by somehow making us fabricate witness testimony from evacuees? Surely we can all agree that the "international human rights movement" (

    ) is just a poor mislead smol bean.

  • Didn't you know that these two things, labor aristocrats supporting imperialism because it's a system that materially benefits them, and the impoverished underclass committing criminal acts because they're trapped in a system which gives them no good options, are actually the same?

  • Many people are but being a nationalist in countries that are historically on the business end of imperialist violence (China, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.) is fundamentally not the same as being a nationalist in a country that's perpetrating that violence (USA, Europe, etc.).

    "Patsocs" are dishonest reactionaries that draw a false equivalency between those two types of nationalism to excuse their support for imperialism and colonialism.

  • Because she's suggesting taking advantage of the Nazi opposition to the Weimar government to abolish the FreikorpsReichswehr.

    The right doesn't actually want to abolish the FBI, unless it's to replace it with something even worse. The right's latest surface-level grudge can't be used to push leftist policy. This only works if you have a strong movement that can play reactionaries against each other and take power afterwards. I think we all know that's not the case here.