As a non native English speaker, I had to read your comments to understand the "Hot potato" one... Seems that I'm not as fluent in English as I thought (my accent is shit)

I can understand (I hate this video title actually), but yeah, telling that "That guy is an idiot" without listening at what he said is not smart

During the video, he's listening and debating against some French (?) phylosoph I suppose, that basically said shit like English is just French; then this video adds details about why Yes, but also why not, and where yes and no

Tell me you didn't watch the video without telling me you didn't watch the video

(Title is clickbait, video content is much more sourced and explained)

Twitter PR review

Gotta use Lisp notation to be sure

"No" is the most accurate I could ever have imagined for Inkjet Printers

Old and gold, 15 May 2009

Lemmy instance agnostic link: !boinc@sopuli.xyz

inplace sort be like:

def sort(list: list):
    list.clear()

Comics are not only meant to present something that can happen IRL :P

That kind of trolls happen occasionally in IT, where not everybody know well about maths and physics, they may easily fall into these kind of traps by taking granted that the maths you gave is more trustful than computer code they wrote (usual kind of joke to make your friend understand that he what was doing something wrong or without understanding)

Also, in Uni, we were all little Satans, trying more to break others students works instead of trying to improve self (that was a true war among IT students). All means were used, this kind of troll (as depicted in this comics) to make the other loose time is truly expected

Classical "type Alt+F4 before saving your code to automatically fix bugs" kind of joke

HTML: You are not a nerd

Edit: OH MY GOD what did you just share !!!

Not hard

Not hard, that's true, I agree 100%

However the problem here is to have the idea to do so. It seems obvious to you, but I can't see why. Nothing told OP to do anything for posting that link (neither Feddit.nl neither this community rules). He may just not had the idea to precise that this content was needing a paid subscription to be accessed

Less misleading

You know, Nebula is where NJB post most of their videos (if you watched any of his video on Youtube in the last 2 years you should know). It's just logical at some point to get Nebula content shared on this very community.

And yes I can't access it because I haven't got Nebula subscription. But I'll still enjoy discussing about it, see what others thought about it, the good, the bad, what's around the subject... Like any discussion about a recent movie or Netflix series that I obviously need to pay to watch; do we need to precise that it isn't free ?

If you didn't know it wasn't free, once you open any Nebula link, it will be written in big. All explained and understandable by everyone. I can't see where anyone have been mislead

This kind of content is fully expected and there is no rule to tell us to do something about it for now

Why would we not expect someone to share a video from a payed platform ? Maybe the problem is the expectation; nowhere in any rule of any kind is it written that Lemmy is to share Free content only.

Do you suggest to add some kind of "[Paywall]" to the title of the post as community often do with news articles requiring subscription for example ?

So don't watch it, what is the problem ?

Aye

Also available in other languages here:

• ES: https://youtu.be/yuPSXBZYS54
• FR: https://youtu.be/Gqa5CGXRH-c
• JP: https://youtu.be/kqAIXkb2rB4
• KR: https://youtu.be/q7vVk1k2-IQ

I was like "Hum... That should do like more than 3.5, but 4 at maximum..."

Then he shows options, and I was like "What ? There's nothing between 3.5 and 4"; then thought about it a bit more, and found Exactly 4 as an answer; then continued to watch the end of the video to see why my calculations were wrong (they wer'nt)

// Move to the right

Do I need to precise that my post was a /s ? It was ! Actually already 2 comments are saying that US is missing, so I joked about it and about the fact some said this is biased because countries are missing

Actually there is all the source given in the picture itself, if a country is missing, maybe check the data before complaining about people hiding things to you; maybe the data itself does not exists for the country you think is missing

Excluding the US in a chart subtitled "European life-work balance" is bad, noted