Glytch @ Glytch @ttrpg.network Posts 0Comments 104Joined 2 yr. ago
I know that legally they have the right. I'm saying they shouldn't have that right because reanimating a digital facsimile of your corpse just to puppet it to make money is fucked up. This includes shit like the CG Tarkin and Leia in Star Wars as well as the Tupac hologram
It could do that, but its writing would be hollow because those stories are meaningful due to the lived experiences behind them. For example anyone who's read The Diary of a Young Girl could write something similar in Anne Frank's style, but it wouldn't be nearly as impactful because learning about an event is very different from living through it.
Who cares if his estate agreed to it? HE didn't. His estate shouldn't have the right to make money off of things he never actually did.
Let the dead stay dead, it's just an excuse to not pay new, living artists.
The joke is that Doom, specifically, will run on anything.
Commentary doesn't need to be parody and, intentional or not, this is commentary and therefore protected.
This is why you make friends with an artificer.
It's an improvised melee weapon when you smack someone with it because you aren't using the weapon as designed.
No they don't, they just add a greater number of misinterpretable rules.
Okay, but isn't he also more likely to put a bullet through another human being than anything?
I'd say you're wrong there too. It's about the players and DM collaborating, improvising, and creating the adventure we all want to have. We're all in this to have fun and tell interesting stories. It works best when everyone is bought-in and affecting the story.