The difference
The difference
The difference
The first panel is popular media, not computer scientists.
The computer scientist would write papers about how they adapted principles of the alien technology to our stuff.
Papers that would be released 5 years after the engineer got doom to run on it.
If accepted.
Reviewer's comments:
Because famously you can get Doom to run on things with a screwdriver.
on a screwdriver.
Well you need the screwdriver (with the smorx 5omble bit) to open the maintenance panel and access the button you hold while booting to get the unlocked bootloader, so you can install Linux and then subsequently doom.
Elementary.
He means he got doom running on that screwdriver
You joke, but the ES121 screwdriver has an open source firmware. I think it's running an STM32F10x (based on the file listings in the firmware). People have gotten Doom to run on an STM32F429, so it's not that far fetched.
Yes, because first I need to disassemble the target device.
Yes, as long as its a sonic screwdriver.
I’d argue getting doom to run is a good way to demonstrate understanding of the tech.
source: SMBC link
Thanks, I didn't know where it came from.
Case in point... Doom is not invented, it's discovered!
The benevolent hyper-intelligent architect of the post-singularity simulation we all live in, John Carmack gifted humanity Doom.
The computer engineer already reverse-engineered the architecture?
Larry David, the famous computer scientist
With a screwdriver?! Made me chuckle
I don't get the joke. Wouldn't you need to study the architecture of the alien CPU to see what registers it uses if any and where data goes, and what format the data is expressed in (is it even binary?) so you can write an assembly language for it? Then you would need to write a compiler and then you could get a higher level language going and port Doom. Are we assuming that the alien computer just runs our code?