This terminology for the animal originated as a taboo avoidance term: proto-Germanic tribes replaced their original word for bear—arkto—with this euphemistic expression out of fear that speaking the animal’s true name might cause it to appear
Omg seabear
riot
That isn't in the nature of liberals, who are the only people who care about this conflict.
They're really trying to expand this war.
So with all the aid money the US gives to countries it's backing in wars, I have to ask:
Aren't they worried that too much of their money is in the hands of too many people? Like with all the billions that they keep giving to the likes of Ukraine, Taiwan, Israel, etc. Doesn't the dollar inflate and become less valuable in the world? They're just printing dollars atp, if I were a Ukrainian politician with a few hundred million in US $ I'd start using that to win favors in other countries that need US dollars to pay their debts.
Start my own lending service with all the money I have.
I've seen a post on this site pushing an anti-refugee meme targeted at syrians. It got deleted, but still I was shocked.
I stay on hexbear for a reason lmao.
They do it for the same reason anyone else does it: propaganda
It takes time to deprogram, and no one is immune.
The US subsidizes dairy and beef, when in reality putting that money into subsidizing grains and vegetables is so much more beneficial for people in the long run.
Can you imagine getting 4 heads of fresh lettuce or kale for 1$, it could be so much better.
It's not just that, often times those unhealthy foods are all that are available to people. Food deserts are a thing, people do their grocery shopping at convenience stores.
Overworking people to the point where they might not have time to cook a meal is also an issue.
This site is so weird.
Indigenous rights are non-negotiable. land deeds, contracts, and agreements made between the bourgeoisie do not overrule the right of the people to their own land.
You sound exactly like a Palestinian genocide denier. Since when do "rulers" making decisions to give up an entire country to another state mean anything?
Kings, shahs, priests, etc have no right to sign off ownership to another country.
The kashmiris of today want freedom and independence, fuck India and Pakistan.
It's insane. Maybe they need a genocide broadcasted to them on their phones to actually take kashmiri suffering seriously.
I literally have kashmiris in my community and they all agree that India is trying to do to them what Isntrael is doing to the Palestinians.
India literally says this is why they're so allied with Israel.
I'm not debating with a Nazi about indigenous rights. Your ignorance isn't my problem
Kashmir has more diverse issues of religious radicalization and unsettled border issues.
That doesn't negate the fact that non-kashmiris are attempting to colonize Kashmir.
Also: That's literally what kashmiris themselves say about their issue. India literally allies with Israel because it wants to copy their model of apartheid.
Yeah I had to go on your page and click a few links but I got to it!
I just read it! (I googled the link and found it!) Great read!
Me too, will you post the link here?
First time I can confidently say: the protestors are dumbasses.
Even the US has this policy
If a coup does happen and Georgia follows Ukraine's example, I'd like to see the faces of the protestors. At some point you just can't feel sorry for people anymore.