General_Effort @ General_Effort @lemmy.world

Posts

120

Comments

1,829

Joined

2 yr. ago

Ich finde das aus ressilienz gründen schon enorm wichtig.

Aus so einem Grundrecht ergibt sich aber keine Resilienz. Das Backend bleibt digital. Die meisten Leute wählen die bequeme Lösung, sodass da Kapazität nicht vorhanden wäre.

Das erinnert mich ein bisschen an den Brexit, wo viele Leute sich Wunschvorstellung zurechtgelegt hatten, anstatt über die tatsächlich erwartbaren Folgen nachzudenken.

Das können wir ins GG einfügen, direkt nach dem Recht auf ein windmühlenfreies Leben.

Wo sind eigentlich die deutschen Digitalvereine, die sich progressiv und gesellschaftlich positiv einbringen, wie die EFF in den USA? Der CCC macht irgendwie nur noch mit gemeinnützigen Pentests von sich reden.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT4-Chan

What you're saying is that the government should control access to information, so that people will hold the correct ideology.

I don't think that's a game that a liberal democracy can win.

What would a use case look like?

I assume that the latency will make it impractical to train something that's LLM-sized. But even for something small, wouldn't a data center be more efficient?

Das können wir direkt ins GG einfügen nach dem Recht auf ein windmühlenfreies Leben.

Wo sind eigentlich die deutschen Digitalvereine, die sich progressiv einbringen, wie die EFF in den USA? Der CCC macht irgendwie nur noch mit gemeinnützigen Pentests von sich reden.

I'm too lazy to check it now, but here's GPT-4o mini (via DDG). Maybe I'll give Gemini a chance later, too.

Hmm. Interesting question. I haven't done real math in quite a long time and am absolutely stumped.

So that wasn’t sarcasm?

Not quite sarcasm, not quite reductio ad absurdum. It's just a reminder of certain psychological realities.

Possible instance of backwards causation

Don't see how you get that.

If that’s a steelman then it’s definitely at forging temperature (which jet fuel btw can achieve easily), collapsing under its own weight.

I don't understand. I simply agreed with the previous poster. Do you disagree with anything I wrote?

Yes. That's a good use of resources. Any country will do it that way, and has done it that way. The engineers develop new weapons. The workers build them. Entertainers do propaganda. Anyone else goes to the front.

However, during Elvis Presley's time to serve, there was no hot war being fought. I don't think US conscripts were sent into battle between the end of the UN operation in Korea/the Korean War, and some time after the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

Prove you're not a camel. Props to Timothy Snyder for calling that one.

Bullshit. At 21, he was eligible for conscription as any other male US citizen, and so he was conscripted.

A peaceful stint with the NATO forces in Germany was typical at the time. I don't think any US conscripts saw battle during these years.

Not really. They are powered by language models, after all.

Still, much of math is about manipulating symbols. So it is not mind-blowing that a certain understanding of math is there and can be improved on. But math also involves an understanding of space, or geometry. There I wouldn't expect much.

Anyway. My 2 top takeaways from the article:

1. Mathematicians are hired to improve the major AI services.
2. They are required to use E2EE (Signal) for communication so that their work doesn't get picked up and used for LLM-training before the time is ready.

World's second-smallest violin?

It depends on where you are, I think. Was yours more of a beer lab or a wine lab?

Because of the word "fucking"?

It's one for the ages, though. It's been covered by a lot of Big Names over the decades. Ozzy Osbourne, Green Day, Marylin Manson, Marianne Faithful, Cyndi Lauper, Manic Street Preachers. And a lot of others. It's gotten quieter about the song these days, I guess, maybe because guitars are somewhat out of fashion.

Gender Studies

Krass. Das gibt's ja wirklich als Studiengang.

So what kind of mimicry is this?

Do they predate on cops?

Oh yes. You absolutely don't have to believe that the earth is billions of years old to understand geology. You just have to assume that it looks like it is, while doing geology. That's completely compatible with believing that it really is just 8,000 years old.