Science should never be trusted. The whole point is that you can test it and verify it. Take nothing on trust or faith. Verify, verify, and verify with that scientific method.
You jest but those strikes are the only thing keeping Godzilla at bay. 👻
Follow the storage rules:
3-2-1
3 or more copies
2 or more different medias
1 or more off site
While not saying out right that it is bad, he is certainly implying it and clearly telling his audience that they should not buy it.
At 32:42 of the video of the original report.
https://youtu.be/FGW3TPytTjc
I am on mobile and can't figure out timestamps.
The Federation is Headquartered out of Paris France. You must be thinking Starfleet.
Had not heard of him. Turns out to be a worthy research hole to fall into for others wondering.
Agreed. I don't see a path to justify forced labor as something that benefits all, but damn there are trying.
Seems like a good skill to have in the back pocket even today.
You made the assumption that she could not receive abortion healthcare in the allowed 20 weeks at the time. I do not want to form my opinion on an assumption or feeling. I am going by what the article state since no one else has provided links to additional information on this case.
She was sentenced for the crime she admitted guilt to. Seems fair from the information I have.
You arguments may hold up better in the case of the mother when her sentencing come up.
"Who cares. The political compass is a fucking joke that nobody should be taking seriously."
You appear to as you try to throw ideas that challenge you into buckets when you say "Sure is easy being a conservative, isn’t it?"
My understanding is that the law for abortion was 20 weeks at the time. That was more inline with European standards.
Regardless, you cannot just hide the remains. If that were legal bad clinics would be in there right to dump remains.
Either way you seem to be making a lot of assumptions. If you have links about this case that have more context of the situation I would be happy to read them.
I am a -1.5 by - 4.21 on the political compass if that makes you feel superior.
"In May, Burgess pleaded guilty to a felony charge of removing or concealing human skeletal remains."
If that is the case, people are a lot stranger then I thought. I thought not hiding and/or stealing human remains was something most people supported. Learned another new thing today
If you have addtional links to information about this case I would be fine taking a look and reanalyzing my position.
If not, please refain from making things up. It pushes people who are more open minded away from your position.
"In May, Burgess pleaded guilty to a felony charge of removing or concealing human skeletal remains."
I don't see the case they could raise unless they want to try to codify whether or not the remains are human at 28 weeks.
Do you have additional link with info to add about this case?
The article does not mention any life threatening issues with the pregnancy.
"In May, Burgess pleaded guilty to a felony charge of removing or concealing human skeletal remains."
They let you hide and steal bodies in India? Guess I learned something new today.
"In May, Burgess pleaded guilty to a felony charge of removing or concealing human skeletal remains."
Yes, I think hiding and/or stealing human remains should remain a crime.
If I am reading this right, this sentencing is not even for the abortion. It is for hiding the body.
The UN is successful in it primary role. It is a forum to keep people talking instead of having a nuclear war.