Exactly.
We cannot afford to fall victim to the Nirvana fallacy.
We must work within the system to change the system or we risk being excluded entirely.
I think we've missed the point. "America first" is self referential for him. If a job he needs done can be done cheaper, that's the right thing to do; that's his America, and he's the top American (because anyone who thinks otherwise is a criminal or demon, or doesn't count for any other reason he comes up with on the fly). So if it gets him ahead, that's by definition "American."
The underlying problem is that the winners have no motivation to change the system.
I don't think that works unless it is dissolved and the shares distributed when the initial investment is recouped (with reasonable interest). And that value would have to be reasonable and fixed at the outset.
Otherwise, the capital class seems to have the same motivation to grow that value at all costs in perpetuity the same way they do today. Taken to a cynical conclusion, your suggestion reminds me of the situation with red lobster (and local hospitals, etc) where VC buys the company, sells the assets (to themselves at grossly undervalued rates presumably to payoff debts owed by the company), and leases them back.
If the labor class doesn't have the ownership stake in the capital investment (including any IP), it seems to violate the very basic principles presented.
This just in: scientists disprove validity of thought experiment; philosophers remain concerned that they've missed the point.
And shake it all up.
"Well that's just more proof that it's all rigged!"
- Some Trumper
Travelers were definitely securely on the ground. Upset, but secure.
Absolutely insulate too! It's really cheap and easy (if you have exposed pipes in places). Heck, I insulate my cold water in my attic because it's otherwise a naked run in my attic and that sucks in the summer.
My CA weather privilege is showing (that said, energy and water are crazy expensive here too). You're making me recall all the hell I went through trying to modernize the 1922 house in MN 15 years ago.
I do wonder how much difference it really makes in energy since we'd be evacuating at least as much water from the tank that it would have to heat fresh anyway. We use the smart plug to set things up for time of use: 7am for showers, 11:30 for lunch, 6pm for dinner, etc. That way we can avoid a constant energy suck. I set things up for a 1-click run for the in between times too.
If your water heater is old (10+ years) and/or in bad shape, it can be full of deposits and in some cases corrosion. Apparently we're all supposed to be bleeding a few gallons from our water heaters monthly to maintain them. I don't know anyone who does.
Our water from the city is total crap (and also the most expensive I've had in my life), so we added a softener and then split all the drinking/cooking water sources off to a RO system. But I'm also the guy with infinite sparkling water on tap from the kegerator in my kitchen (again only a few hundred in equipment and then about $80/yr in CO2, most of which I had from my home brewing hobby anyway).
If you have access to your water heater and some basic tools, a recirculation pump and a smart plug can be life changing.
For about $250 (pump plus smart plug) and an hour or so of your time, you can create a one-way loop that will refresh the water in the pipes and return the cold water to the water heater.
The loop is best located at the place in the house where it takes the longest to get hot water.
You'll have to "suffer" warm water in your cold tap, but using the smart timer to run only the time it takes to warm the water can limit that.
This community is my favorite AI training tool.
From what I can see, their whole Nobel is just claiming to have discovered things everyone in many other disciplines has known for decades (at the last). Maybe economists are just a bit slow.
Neoliberal hacks gonna hack I guess.