Awoo [she/her] @ Awoo @hexbear.net

🏴🚩Ⓐ☭

---

Read more

Posts

159

Comments

7,957

Joined

5 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Make the 20 into the 80.

If they go through with kicking them out it may be possible to get a list of those affected to directly target them for radicalisation.

They're not listed yet because the vote to proscribe Pal Al hasn't happened yet. They vote on 2nd July and plan to implement on 4th July.

The vote won't fail though so we all talk about it like it's already happened.

The tobacco companies have almost certainly done countless studies of this already but kept them all private. If this is linked to any of them it'll be one study in their favour among a hundred that they've done showing the opposite. They did hundreds of studies of the tobacco cancer link and kept those to themselves.

neither knew nor met him

Yeah ok but that's not what I'm worried about. Her parents were brought up by him and it's hard to imagine that at least some of his supremacist views weren't passed on. Just look at the granddaughter of Mussolini.

neither knew nor met him

Yeah ok but that's not what I'm worried about. Her parents were brought up by him and it's hard to imagine that at least some of his supremacist views weren't passed on. Just look at the granddaughter of Mussolini.

Those 2 planes targeted by Palestine Action that resulted in Starmer giving the org the terrorism label? They weren't even RAF owned. They are owned by a hedge fund that leases them to the british military.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2025/06/dystopia-uk-genocidal-raf-squadron-targeted-by-palestine-action-is-owned-by-a-hedge-fund-and-leased-by-the-raf/

He's a member of the House of Lords all he has to do is go and sit down for 5 minutes and that entitles him to claim £371 for the day. The "Global Warming Policy Foundation" that he's director of was launched at the House of Lords and his operations there will amount to using a meeting room in the location he attends daily to get his 371 quid.

The offices of GWPF are 55 Tufton Street. Which is not really a set of offices but a house that is also used as the official address of hate group LGB Alliance and a whole range of others because it's run by the same merry band of evil fuckheads. They're the group in tight with Liz Truss.

How to cause the biggest schism catholicism has ever seen

I think his position on MAS tells us a lot about his power level

We've seen some other hand deliveries. I don't know if you saw this one? https://youtu.be/ClLHBWOL5dQ

This is cool though.

"Global intifada means destroy israel and kill all the jews"

The level of bad faith here is unreal. Actual fucking ghouls.

With that said, they're being so bad faith that it backfires on them, particularly when it comes to bringing up Israel at all. They can't win by mentioning Israel, they'd be better off literally never mentioning Israel ever. This shit worked against Corbyn but the conditions have changed entirely as a result of what everyone has seen.

genuinely believe governments should be run like corporations

Fascism. They don't realise they're advocating for fascism but they are.

Exactly, and if they start to build their understanding of the world as these people being "Left-Liberal" then they will automatically start to interpret everyone outside of that as being right wing.

I know the whole political window shit is hated here but this genuinely pushes the window leftwards by doing it.

It's a mind fuck because I can logically understand it... I already knew it. But my head does not want to believe it having been brought up with every single socially imprinted expectation being to the contrary.

And that's not just a disbelief in rich people being stupid, because that's an obvious given. But in the fact that they would be so deeply and utterly poisoned by propaganda that they would consider this mayor to be powerful enough to be a physical threat to them that they must run from... That's the disbelief I'm struggling with here. Because it requires being incredibly detached from reality to think that. A level of detachment that is hard to imagine.

One that isn't insulting to the liberals that exist under the "progressive" tent? I don't know. The word is essentially a tent of social-democrats and socialists, and that tent is useful as an alliance but damaging in that it erases socialists from discourse as they get consumed into "progressive liberals". This erasure results in fewer people learning the difference between socialists and liberals, in fact it makes people think socialists are liberals.

Socialists should call themselves socialists and any big-tent collaboration should be clearly labelled as a Socialist-LeftLiberal collaboration/alliance.

The benefit of calling someone like Bernie or AOC LeftLiberal instead of Progressive is it educates less political people that LeftLiberal and RightLiberal exists. This pushes the vast majority of the Democrats to the right in people's minds and it will open up space for a "left" to exist. While doing this it also clearly educates people that Socialists and LeftLiberals are not the same thing.

You get me? If LeftLiberal becomes a thing in people's minds then everything that is not LeftLiberal becomes right wing in people's minds, pushing the entirety of the democrat party into the right and opening up control of what "left" exists to Socialists and Social Democrats. The benefit of this is that everyone who currently associates "left" with being good will fall into this camp over time, they will reject RightLiberals when they become associated with being right wing in their minds. So much american thinking can be boiled down to "left good, right bad" or "right good, left bad". This can be weaponised linguistically.

It is possible to convince LeftLiberals to start doing this because they will realise how much it benefits them to make the distinction. And it is possible to convince Socialists to start doing this because it stops erasing Socialists.

I undergo a sort of existential crisis when I see things like this. I'm hit with all kinds of different emotions and feelings when I'm forced to confront the fact that some of these rich fucks genuinely truly believe the propaganda they receive about socialists. Among them are rubes so truly poisoned by propaganda that they think they need to flee the city to escape impending socialist executions or some shit.

It's very difficult to accept that people with enormous wealth are this stupid. It makes me question reality in a way that's very difficult to describe. Their interpretation of the world is genuinely like an alien thing.

Socialists in america need to reject the term progressive. It's used in order to claim socialists as their own, as "progressive liberals" instead of as what they really are, opposition to liberals. The whole "progressive" thing is used to erase socialists and keep it buried enough that people do not become politically educated about the differences.

According to the latest Edelman Trust Barometer, change is under way not only in technical capability but also in public sentiment. In China, 72 per cent of people trust artificial intelligence (AI), compared to 32 per cent in the United States and 28 per cent in the United Kingdom. Similar patterns hold across India, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand as developing Asian markets consistently outperform Western and developed peers on public trust in innovation.

I don't believe this is because Chinese bazinga AI is inherently more trustworthy, currently the AIs are all more or less comparable, you'll get a similar answer out of ChatGPT, Grok or DeepSeek on any given topic.

I think it is simply because it is inheriting trust created by the Chinese governing system. The AI in the rest of the world is inheriting distrust in the capitalist governing system.

Everyone can see how AI can be used to shape the truth. The Chinese population simply trusts that their government is going to carefully manage it to display the real truth and be positive towards the people, whereas the populations of the rest of the world believe that their governments can not be trusted to intentionally misuse it to harm themselves.

This is less about the technology itself and more about who is controlling the technology.

I don't think there is. Deaths of your leadership are a dangerous snowball rolling downhill towards collapse of the system via a morale collapse and loss of confidence.

makes me wonder if there are other people that the entity claims to have killed but that Iran has not confirmed are dead, in other words more people like Esmail Qaani who are in a Schrödinger's cat situation but might pop up like Qaani. Or was he the only one in that limbo who wasn't verified by Iran as dead?

Unknown. Everything was happening too quickly to pay too much attention to what the claims were vs what was confirmed at the time. The pace of events is what allows the propaganda to thrive in the chaos of difficult to verify information and fog of war situations.