Skip Navigation

Antiwork [none/use name, he/him]
Antiwork [none/use name, he/him] @ Antiwork @hexbear.net
Posts
67
Comments
708
Joined
4 yr. ago

  • Doing this right at the beginning of the week is def a choice guess the WH really wanted this story in the top of the news all day

  • Suing often is done with no justification just to create another problem for people in hope that they stop doing something so they don't have to deal with the legal process or can't afford it

  • Not understanding the basic principle you never support the us state department

  • Less about the posts more about the comments

  • The power does exist within the workers. The NLRB if it were to truly be pro labor would be a full extension arm of labor. I find no contradiction in having a federal labor bureaucratic agency that protects the rights of labor. The fact that agency could be used to destroy labor unions should be fought and a fight leftist should show up to.

  • Rooting on the failure of the NLRB in hopes that it creates the contradictions needed for an uprising of the labor movement is naive. As we currently see in the labor movement when the ruling class threatens workers ability to eat and have a shelter they cave and I don't think this is simply because institutional powers tell them to. I think there's plenty of critique for these institutions, but what organizational power do leftists have in the labor movement to move people once there is no NLRB or its power removed so much it becomes meaningless?

  • Or they will just cease to exist. They will be deemed illegal and everything will become a wildcat strike. This take feels like accelerationist but for labor unions

  • Regular courts that they also control are far more expensive and will never rule in their favor so no union would waste resources doing it

  • This is a bad point to make for change. I reject everything british