That's not what this is about

Why did the governor veto everything but this? It doesn't say her reasoning. She's vetoed a bunch of other anti LGBTQ laws, but let this one slip by?

The article says she did not comment, I'm super curious why this was allowed.

Edit: the OP has "big proponent of killing all cis men" in their bio, just a warning that this may be a bad faith troll account. They've banned me from other communities for participating in 196, which is apparently transphobic to them.

Is this about that time Jason Alexander (George from Seinfeld) played the grim reaper in The Twilight Zone

Or is this a different reference about a different Geroge playing the grim reaper?

Why does a startup let people do this? Were people not able to do this before and now with a start up suddenly they can? How much does the start up get?

A reminder that the Confederate Constitution literally said black people would forever be property

Article I Section 9(4) No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed

You just keep that on hand?

While they physically kill the most birds by volume, the biggest decrease to bird populations is the ecological destruction of the environment. The pesticides we use actually make their egg shells non viable, but for some reason none of the studies count this figure in the "birds killed" category. It would double cats.

On top of that, we have deforestation wrecking their mating areas. People like to measure forestation in ground covered squared, while ignoring that the vast majority of migratory species only mate in specific areas.

Circling back to pesticides, the food supply has been wrecked. The food that is left avaliable is often filled with chemicals still that cause diseases, make their already fragile bones even weaker, cause feather malformation, blindness, organ failure, and cause outright sterilization.

But for some reason that's not listed in the "birds killed" figure.

Cats might kill a bunch of birds, but with a figure that's as broad as 1 to 4 billion, you need to question the validity of the argument and wonder why they leave so many other factors out of these figures.

It's the same kind of thing where they shame us for individual level consumption of pollutants and plastics, while corporations greatly outweigh consumers pollution. Both are a problem, yes cats do kill a shit load of birds, but this reddit level factoid keeps getting spread around and the reap threats aren't being educated on. You can't really say they're the "number one thing killing birds" unless you're using the figures that outright ignore other important information

Oh you mean the god level genocide episode

Dude accidentally killed 50 000 000 000

I have a solid black cat that you can just do anything with. If he's laying there you can lay with him and he's happy or you can pick him up and carry him ti a whole other room and put him somewhere and as long as you give him a few pets he'll be happy.

Yes, it is. They don't have to vote that way, but free speech means I get to make a case for it.

That's literally democracy.

I actually managed to get mine done early this year, April 13th at 4 am.

Nothing you said conflicted with any of my points, lol

I was just saying the other day to one of my friends that I have never had a USB-C port fail on me in anyway.

Two sides of a coin I guess.

F

This is actually facism. There is no other word that even fits. There is no way to misdirect this. It's facism

This isn't one of those "Everyone I don't like is a Nazi" type accusations. This is just facism

Hamas is a terrorist organization that kills Palestinians, too, they're funded by Iran and China, and were not even elected, they literally just took control. Don't give them the slightest bit of ground to stand on.

You defending them only validates Isreal's response against Palestinian in this conflict.

They're thugs, they don't represent Palestinian, but by giving credence to their organization, you basically okay the attacks on Palestinian civilians.

You don't know what you're even defending, and then when called out for it you say I'm genocidal, lol. Really proved my point there for me, you think you know more than you do

Because it invalidates your opinion on everything, imo. Shows a lack of critical thinking and shows you think you know more than you actually do.

I've tried voice assistants, won't be viable until there's at least half a million autistic linux users who iron out all the kinks for a self hosted service.

Don't forget that the south was trying to force the north ro send back escaped slaves, depite the north using their states rights to say no. The south would also send Bounty hunters to go kidnap free born black people to sell into slavery. So yeah, states rights was an issue. The right to identify people as human.

But let's not also forget that the confederate constitution had a passage that says that there will not be any laws capable of being passed that infringe on the right to own black people

Article I Section 9(4) No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed