Nvidia (who makes the RTX 4080Ti graphics card) can tell me the Ti is pronounced "tie" all they want. They are wrong. It's "tee eye". I will die on this hill.
Minifigs are smashed up and used to create minifignewtons, which are the subsidiary units of fignewtons per square metre, also known as a FigPascal; a measurement of fig-based soft biscuitness.
Our advertising policy requires us to call them "generic Danish interlocking children's building set" men. 😆
But yeah, agree. I think they were better when they were just generic yellow humanoids with smiley faces and assorted wigs/hats.
I don't think as I child I ever ascribed them a gender of their own; they were always the player character in the world's I'd build. e.g. if I was playing with them, they were boys and they were girls when my sister was playing with them.
FWIW, one of the best parts of the Foosball Table set (21337) is the shear number of wigs and faces it comes with so you can totally customize your players. It comes with 22 "generic Danish interlocking children's building set" men and 44 unique wigs/heads. It's pretty cool imo
I don't rememeber 'men' being prominent in the packaging and we just called the people 'legos' like the rest of the sets. So i'm half with you on them being kegos and not minifigs, but all of the people in the sets are just legos.
Can't think of a situation where that distinction would be necessary. Like for the castle set we called them knights or soldiers, police were police, that guy was that guy, etc.
There's nothing to remember here, the dude just didn't know what they were called as a kid. They've been minifigs since their creation in the late 70s.
Also they've sucked ever since they stopped having basic smiley faces
Well now you're just trolling, sir. The faces used for the Legoredo (western) sets are amazing. I particularly like the grinning Mexican with gold teeth. I call him Sanchez.
Sure, that's true, but using Lego boys and Lego girls and just Lego people in general works too and is simpler, right?
I'm sure explaining that "Man is more like human in this case and not a gender or sex" is fun sometimes but ideas are evolving with more people and eventually it will just look too much like "Man is dogwhistle for subjugating women under men by calling them men".
Is this bad connotation that more people will see over time worth holding onto the word Man as meaning everybody when we could just evolve our usage of language?