Trump hush-money trial: Juror excused over concerns identity made public - BBC News
Trump hush-money trial: Juror excused over concerns identity made public - BBC News
After hours of questioning, a full jury is finally found on day three of the ex-president's criminal trial.
Jury is shrinking, not growing
Kayla Epstein in New York
Jury selection is now into its third day, and we have actually lost a juror rather than gaining any.
We are now down to six. Here is how we got here:
As my colleague Madeline Halpert reported earlier, Juror #2 asked to be excused because people in her life had started to figure out her identity based on news reports.
It goes to show the extremely high stakes not just for Donald Trump, his lawyers, and the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, but the 12 regular people who will be swept up in the trial along with them.
The court went back and forth over the most revealing questions – about employers and employment history. Justice Merchan ultimately agreed with Trump’s lawyers that it was important to obtain information about prospective juror’s employers.
But he issued a caveat: those answers will be struck from the court records, and he directed the dozens of reporters watching from an overflow courtroom not to publicly report those answers.
*** A further update posted just now ... ***
Madeline Halpert reporting from court
We've just been told that juror number four has been excused.
That means we're now down to five jurors. We don't know why exactly he was dismissed.
You're viewing a single thread.
There was a lot of discussion on this yesterday. It seems to me like way too much information regarding the jurors is getting out.
Well, yeah. Trump is a wannabe mob boss and is using his cult to tamper with the jury.
The information getting out is on the Judge and how they manage their courtroom. Its their courtroom.
Yes, because people who break the law run it past the judge first.
The judge can shut this down.
Like how they explain the way he's started shutting down the seep of information in the article?
Yeah, I highlighted some of that here: