You aren't arch user if you dislike read documentation

.......just the weirdest boner right now.......

Any girls wanna pull my hair and read me the Arch wiki 👀

Honestly the arch wiki is like a black hole, dragging Linux users towards using arch. I got so used to using arch wiki on other distros that it eventually got me to switch to something arch based.

Edit: btw

Solely for scientific reasons for my friend, where is the original image from?

arch user are hot :,)

The arch wiki is generally actually good though. Dumbed down where it needs to be, usable examples, and in a familiar format.

ArchWiki is the best documentation out there of operating systems in general. I consult it even if not dealing with Arch

I'm a Debian enjoyer and still read the arch wiki

I need the whole bottom end of the picture before saying anything.

Honestly, the arch wiki is hit and miss. Sometimes it has the information you need written in a way that you can understand, and sometimes the examples randomly switch graphics cards mid-sentence.

this is probably the most commented post on Lemmy where that KOLANAK blue letter guy hasn't commented yet

I don't get it. Women don't exist, this is just a fantasy

So where's the Gentoo user? Behind the camera probably. Compiling the scene.

I appreciate the Arch wiki much, even as a layman Kubuntu user. It explains some background concepts pretty well which aren't typically coveyed in man pages which dedicate themselves to individual commands and their syntax. For instance I've read about home folder encryption or how signals get converted from keyboard presses to symbols on screen. It's not perfect when it comes to writing style and coverage sure, but it's a valuable compendium to have in addition to everything else.

You aren't a Linux user if you don't like to RTFM.

A lot of the time there's just no way around it.

i like how this is literally just porn.

That's not fair. I'm an arch user and the only time I'd set foot on a forum is to ask a question you won't find an answer to in the wiki, the subreddit, some weird defunct blog nobody has made a post on in 11 years or the source code. And I probably won't be answering any questions with RTFM or anything else for that matter.

What's the context? Never mind, I don't want to know

Btw, someone wants to write about bluetooth? This area is lacking in Arch Wiki.

Arch is the reason I gained the patience to read documentation. I'm glad I did that, cause I can read docs while learning how to do programming without getting bored.

Not a Linux user but I approve this meme

I appreciate the Arch wiki much, even as a layman Kubuntu user. It explains some background concepts pretty well which aren't typically coveyed in man pages which dedicate themselves to individual commands and their syntax. For instance I've read about home folder encryption or how signals get converted from keyboard presses to symbols on screen. It's not perfect when it comes to writing style and coverage sure, but it's a valuable compendium to have in addition to everything else.

I think I've seen this porno at some point. I clicked away as soon as the milk came out, that's a little weird.

i honestly dont get the hoopla with the wiki. it always feels like entering the library of alexandria without a light and no oil in sight.

Its so confusing and honestly barely readable unless you already have extensive knowledge.