Only a crisis - actual or perceived - produces real change. When that crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around. That, I believe, is our basic function: to develop alternatives to existing policies, to keep them alive and available until the politically impossible becomes the politically inevitable.
Obviously yes. Their production costs barely rose but their prices skyrocketed. Here's a Forbes article from 2022 pointing out that it was increased profit margins causing most of the inflation:
yeah, its not like 90% of the chickens in the country died, so there was no reason for eggs to go from 2 bucks a dozen to 12 bucks a dozen but pure corporate exploitation and greed.
This is just capitalism working as intended. The fact that these price increases are being sold as some kind of abnormality is some real neolib brain in action. It isn't "greedflation," it's literally the same capitalism we've lived with for centuries.
And then go one step further and realize it's always been shit. The only time the world has been great has been when kings and capitalism are on a VERY short leash.
It isn't "greedflation," it's literally the same capitalism we've lived with for centuries.
You're both absolutely right and very wrong: it by definition IS greedflation, inflated prices due to greed.
While it is indeed caused by the same capitalist system we've lived with for centuries, it's getting much worse than it has been now that the billionaires and their corporations have realized that there's no consequences even when their profiteering is so blatant that even the likes of Forbes and WSJ are having to acknowledge what they've been able to distract from before.
There's no such thing as greed in capitalism, though. Rather, greed is the understood foundation from which capitalism is based on. It only works when there is greed. Companies shouldn't avoid raising their prices because they don't want more money, they're supposed to (in capitlism). The system only works when they raise their prices as much as the market will bear.
My grevience with the term "Greedflation" popping up so much recently is that it feels like a cop-out from the current administration to ease economic anxiety without replacing or criticizing the overall economic model. It paints price hikes as a one-time, circumstantial "quirk" of our times, instead of the logical realization of capitalism that it is.
When you say "neolib" are you referring the Neoliberal economic philosophy, or some slang term for modern political liberals?
I ask because Neoliberal Economics is all about this profit, and share holders first, type values. This is in contrast to the post Great Depression, Classical Economics philosophy where companies valued employees first, and shareholders last.
Of course they did. We know they did. All you have to do is go back and read their quarterly earnings calls from 2020 to basically now and they told their shareholders clearly that they were using the pandemic as an excuse to increase profits.
... you can't seriously build a system that is meant to take advantage of every situation, praise if for taking advantage of every situation, align it's interests in taking advantage of every situation and then be surprised it took advantage of a situation. We should be better than Pikachu.
I love self-checkout. I've only gone through a regular checkout line about a dozen times when self-checkout was available at a store but backed up, and haven't had a single fast or good experience. The small talk is depressing, they're so much slower at scanning and keying in produce codes I've memorized by now, their bagging strategy is always abysmal, and unless the line is empty (which, it almost never is), you have not just 1 but 2 people to throw a wrench in the gears of getting checked out. About a quarter of the time the buyer in front doesn't have any basic estimate of how much the stuff they're trying to buy costs, and they end up putting back milk, eggs, and produce but keeping the pack of cigarettes when the card is rejected.
The waiting isn't nearly as bad as the bagging, honestly. I would never put a carton of eggs in its own bag when there are loaves of bread or bags of chips lined up right behind it on the belt. I would never mix refrigerated foods in the same bag as drain cleaner, or go willy nilly mixing pantry items in paper packaging with frozen foods.
Are you saying human quality of life is more important than (strictly financial) profits?? I'm thought that is blasphemy and that I must shame you for it. How dare.
Is this even news, ofc they did, give them an inch and they always take a mile, war, recessions and sickness are always a profiteering venture for business.
See, it's very simple. You create a massive monopoly/duopoly/triopoly, to undercut, out compete and otherwise dominate small businesses, until they've been fazed out.... then once it's only you, and you decide the pricing, then you start screwing around with prices while politicians twiddle their thumbs.
edit: actually I thought you were replying to the folks who were talking about inflation, but now I'm not sure what you're replying to, so maybe disregard the rest of this comment
Inflation dropping just refers to the rate at which prices increase slowing down, not prices themselves going down. Unless regional and federal governments do something, lowered inflation only means relative stability at current price levels.
I love all the headlines that declare [report about thing you already figured out years ago] was in fact true, like it's a fucking surprise. Some would say it's good to have corroborating data, but it never seems to help and I'm just exhausted being right so dammed often.
The grocery stores are mostly monopolies too. I am lucky enough to have a couple good small privately owned grocery stores near me. Their prices haven't gone up nearly as much.
What stunning observational powers they have over there at the FTC. Too bad they don't have any teeth because the government doesn't fund them even close to adequately.
Prices were always going to rise, COVID just gave them an excuse to accelerate it in a shorter amount of time. In Capitalism every company with stockholders has to show ever-increasing profits, because it's never enough. Even if you knock it out of the park one year, you're expected to knock it out of the park even further the next year. And so they keep charging as much as they think they can get away with, and it's really not sustainable. We're approaching the limits of it now as everyone is taking so much that the average citizen doesn't have much more to give.
You expect prices to decrease when demand increases? I would expect the FTC to have taken an economics 101 class.
I was hoping for a little better reporting in this story, like why does "the FTC report suggest the grocery companies were also price-gouging consumers", but this turd is to be expected from a Gannett-owned organization.
Notably, consumers are still facing the negative impact of the pandemic’s price hikes, as the Commission’s report finds that some in the grocery retail industry seem to have used rising costs as an opportunity to further raise prices to increase their profits, which remain elevated today. Source
This just further enforces my belief that the FTC doesn't know much about economics. When there's a high demand and limited supply, prices increase. The increase in retail costs, inflation, is used to limit consumer demand. Of course their profits are going to increase; that's how economics works. There's nothing in this report that seems inappropriate.
I think they'd have better luck attacking the CEOs who are pocketing increasingly inflated salaries and bonuses.