FIA’s F1 spray guard quest might be mission impossible
FIA’s F1 spray guard quest might be mission impossible
The FIA is taking on physics, nature and the wider needs of current Formula 1 cars with its 'wet weather package' - or spray guard - project
Forgive the click-baity title and the fact this is from The Race. I thought it was still an interesting article about a topic that hasn't gotten a lot of coverage.
I really hope they can figure out something to enable true wet weather racing.
How did they do it 20 years ago? I remember Schumacher had "Monsoon" tires that lifted 200 liters per second or something ridiculous like that
From what I've read in other articles the problem isn't so much the capacity to displace water. The problem has more to do with the ground-effect design and how dirty air throws water up rather than out.
Yeah what I meant is that they already had tyres that were displacing an inordinate amount of water and they had the "dirty air" problem since aero became a thing. So it's either that the drivers are not used to driving without seeing or that F1 is too worried about another Bianchi situation.
I'm just unhappy that some races are not run because of rain: some of the best races were epic battles because of the rain leveling the playing field.
A little bit off topic but I'm seriously questionning how important is the completely open-wheel design. For a decade now we're hearing the turbulence the tire creates is a major hurdle to aero development that inevitably leads to cars that can't race each other. And I'm not talking about making aero cars like WEC but something more similar to a dialed down RedBull X2010. Open suspension, open cockpit but enclosed wheels. I just don't understand why the tires have to be out.
Sure this wouldn't fix the rooster tail spray modern cars create but it would mitigate all the water the tires displace. What am I missing here, why can't we cover the tires?
As far as I know the only reason F1 regulations require open-wheel designs is because of tradition, not because it has any performance benefit. When F1 cars were much simpler (50s and 60s) the fastest design paradigm was skinny open wheels, but as aero has become a bigger consideration open wheels have become a hindrance (from a performance standpoint).
I suppose the root question is how much of F1 regulations should be based in tradition and how much should be based in performance. Would an all electric RB2010 type car out-perform a traditional F1 car? Probably. Would it still be an "F1 car (TM)" though? Well, that's subjective.