You could always ask for more, but honestly, unfucking car centric infrastructure is going to take two decades at least of consistent effort and deliberately diverting highway and road funding. I'm putting this square in the 'W' column while noting that there are many, many more 'W's that we still need to claim.
Honestly, just the fact that Biden is explicitly talking about the problem would have been unthinkable just a few years ago, so at the very least it shows that a decent amount of the public is starting to get it. And that support is going to be needed to take measures that are going to be unpopular with a loud (and often well resourced) minority.
You, sir or madam, are an optimist. Certainly let’s do it, but there’s 70+ years worth of car-centric growth to undo, and 70 years with if declining transit to rebuild. It’s a lot.
In the city near me, the project to remove just one of these downtown highways dividing cities took 16 years
I really think that car-centric infra is so bad, that once people get a taste of good urbanism and small and medium businesses see how it benefits them, it'll start picking up a lot of steam. Honest to goodness, the only reason it has such sticking power is that it's really all we know in the US, and people find it hard so hard to imagine that our infra has been deliberately designed badly that they adopt excuses for why it must not work here. But once they see it working and like it, it's going to be on like donkey Kong
Gotta hope we can do better than in the past. How much of big projects delayed just because of old bueracracies and not fully utilizing new technolgiea and ideas?
On problem is most of the money supposedly meant for public transit in the IRA went towards roads and car infrastructure. So I have a feeling somehow this is just gonna make more highways if anything actually materializes from this.
I saw the headline and thought, "we ripping out the highways or doubling down on them with expensive bandaid 'fixes'?"
Doubling down it is. Crap like this is why Biden will never be a "climate president": we can't address the systemic issues that are the primary drivers of climate change as long as we keep trying to work within the confines of said systems.
Some of the blame lies at the feet of state DOTs that are still drawing up these projects. In Austin's case, I think the I-35 widening is basically being forced down the city's throat by a revanchist state government.
Biden is a far right president he just isn't Trump. The only reason we must vote for him. This makes our two teir government bullshit. Because we will never get the changes needed under this current system.
It will always be voting for the lesser evil who is always moving futher right.
I live in easy biking distance of some great stores I'd like to visit more often. That is...assuming there was a bikeable road to that destination. Gigantic highways have basically formed a death wall for bikers and pedestrians keeping them out of fun destinations around my area. If you travel across to a particular crossing and wait half an hour, you might be graced with a cross-walk that sometimes works, while 80 cars honk at you to cross more quickly.
Really hope this turns out well. It'd pay for itself, since those highways are money black holes anyway.
What's amazing about this is that he's attempting to undo what would have been touted as total success when it happened and he was younger. He's of the generation that these were actually built for. Seems even the Silent Generation is realizing that it was a horrible idea that should be undone. Next, please fix suburbs!
That's an incredibly bold plan, but I do love the vague concept. Are we just going to redo all the city planning of the past, what is going to be our new set of standards?
Agreed, but "walkability" is not a set of standards. I'm talking about documents, numbers, widths and lengths, intersection types, grid sizing for repeatable patterns.
It looks like the EPA has published a document on measuring walkability within the USA HERE, and Harvard Researchers have also published a few, but I bet there are also European examples both good and bad we could take from.
I have watched a documentary about how much about motorization USA's roads have been built in the past, I witnessed people attending funerals or other ceremonies while still being sat into their cars... is that ordinary in USA?
Student debt forgiveness actually ended up working for the people who held their debts the longest out of all applicants. Ask your senator about extending the pell grant before saying something else of ill intent towards someone who tried to help.
you mean they pardoned a tiny minority of debtors so they could say they did something?
similar thing happened here and guess what, they aint trying to help, just conning gullible folk into thinking they are actually doing shit.
you know they have the power to actually solve this issue from the roots, right?
same with the prision camps at the us-mexico border, or the endless wars, or privatized healthcare. always starting this shit then pretending a tiny bandaid afterwards was a big win.
I still don't get how all Israel's decades of bullshit, funded and supported by Republican and Democrats, is all suddenly Biden's fault. It sounds like an extremely complex foreign policy has been dumbed down to a simple phrase that can be regurgitated by simpletons. I realize it's election season and Republican operators are out in droves, but I'm getting so tired of that stupid nickname that absolves everyone of complicity. It just shows how little people understand global policy.
You know what I'm tired of? People dismissing genocide because it's politically inconvenient and labeling anyone who cares about genocide a "republican operator".
Hey, remember that time during John Quincy Adams' presidency when he advocated for the abolition of the slave trade?
Or how about the time he vetoed a bill to reauthorize the Second Bank of the United States because he believed in limited government intervention in business affairs?
Or hey, what about that period when he strongly pushed for the independence of Spanish colonies in Latin America?
Or what about the time he proposed a "Monroe Doctrine" which essentially stated that further efforts by European nations to colonize land or interfere with states in North or South America would be viewed as acts of aggression, requiring U.S. intervention?
Adams mostly stuck to his principles, but also, it could be argued that there were times when his decisions weren't entirely beneficial to everyone.
Yeah dude, trump sucks. So does Biden, who we're currently talking about. Record oil production, record homelessness, twice as many migrants detained at the border, supplying weapons to a country engaged in a genocide. Any thoughts?