6-year-old fatally shot by a 9-year-old, authorities say
6-year-old fatally shot by a 9-year-old, authorities say
How the children obtained guns remains a part of the ongoing investigation, according to the Sheriff's office.
Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Sometimes those people are children. But it’s still not the guns fault, obviously. The same thing would have happened if the nine year old child, who had no ill intentions, had a knife instead. Everyone knows it’s just as easy to accidentally stab someone to death as it is to pull a trigger. Happens every day in the EU, I assure you. So many accidentially fatal stabbings by children over the years.
/s in case it wasn’t obvious.
How the children obtained guns remains a part of the ongoing investigation, according to the Sheriff’s office.
I bet it's one of the parents or a close relative that didn't properly store their gun.
When are they going to start throwing people in jail for this?
Just another murderer armed by just another legal gun owner. It's only noteworthy here because of the extremely young age of the murderer, not because "responsible gun owners" seldom arm people who shouldn't have guns.
Lol
This could have been prevented if the 6 year old was armed!
Just another Tuesday in America.
Now the children are shooting each other, just as our fore fathers intended.
Take a bow conservatives…. This one’s on you.
In Philly in July, a 14 yr old with intellectual disabilities accidentally shot her 2 year old cousin with an unsecured gun.
...looking for 2023 data, will update when found.
Gun Violence Archive is not friendly to VPN...
...https://deadorkicking.com/death-statistics/us/2023/
United States Death Statistics by Cause 2023
.*.Covid-19 related deaths are included in influenza.
.*.Beside these major causes of death, 413,888 people died 2023 for other reasons.
.*.Zero death for a cause means the data for the accurate number of deaths is not available at the moment.
Heart disease deaths 385,952
Cancer deaths 322,945
Chronic lower respiratory diseases deaths 62,120
Stroke deaths 98,637
Alzheimer's disease deaths 60,553
Diabetes deaths 68,343
Poisoning deaths 43,844
Kidney disease deaths 30,866
Influenza and Pneumonia deaths 207,784
Suicide deaths 27,489
Homicide deaths 11,103
Liver disease deaths 25,755
Respiratory disease deaths 25,630
Fall deaths 23,566
Firearm deaths 22,981
Septicemia deaths 23,944
Car accident deaths 21,727
Renal disease deaths 21,228
Parkinson's disease deaths 20,501
HIV/AIDS deaths 2,917
edit: format
Gun Violence Archive.
How the children obtained guns remains a part of the ongoing investigation
... It might be bunnies?
Bunnies aren’t just cute like everyone supposes. They got them hoppy legs and twitchy little noses, and what’s with all the carrots? What do they need such good eyesight for anyway?
I was hoping for a LockPickingLawyer video of him opening up a gunsafe with a fucking pube or something.
LockPickingLawyer, friend of gun-violence apologists everywhere.
Being six years old doesn't mean that he's not allowed to defend himself, I see no problem here.
WILD guess, but I am going to say this happened in the US!?
We still don't know if that 6 year old had the legal authority or authorizing paperwork to have that nickname.
Don't break the law and you won't face consequences.
/s for those of you who don't get sarcasm.
"Yeah, dude, I gotta own a gun to protect myself in case aliens attack! Don't worry, nothing bad will happen, it won't be normalized in our society or something!"
More than 26,000 people have died from gunshot wounds this year, according to the Gun Violence Archive.
I used to accept that I'd likely get cancer if I lived long enough…
OP, keep your editorializing out of it.
"how the children obtained guns"? The article gives no indication that there were multiple guns. Your editorializing makes it sound like they were playing with guns and shooting at each other.
The story is bad enough as it is without you lying about it.
The line you quoted as "editorializing" ("how the children obtained guns") is literally a line pulled directly from the article subheader. In other words, there's no editorialization from OP. Like, you do realize that... right? By your replies, I can't tell if you're just trolling hard or that oblivious.
Tell me you didn't read the article, without telling me you didn't read the article...
Is this an example of someone being confidently incorrect?
The bad kid with a gun could have been stopped by a good kid with a gun, duh!