Crypto hedge fund CEO may not exist; probe finds no record of identity

I have to admit, I kind of admire the ballsiness of this scam. It's a mish mash of Madoff, crypto grifters and holo live in an unholy pursuit of insane wealth.

This is delightful. The whole thing is worth a read, but I want to leave this here.

In 2022, a writer... attempted to raise a red flag, noting that all three of the celebrities (Wozniak, Chuck Norris, and Lance Bass) who endorsed Reece Lewis declined to confirm ever knowing him

Wait, did we finally track down Andy Dufresne's "silent silent partner"?

He’s like a hedge fund Mysterio

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles: ::: spoiler Click here to see the summary For years, rumors spread on social media that Steven Reece Lewis, the chief executive officer of a now-shuttered cryptocurrency hedge fund called HyperVerse, was a "fake person" who "doesn't exist."

Fanning out their search, The Guardian uncovered no LinkedIn account for Reece Lewis "or any Internet presence other than HyperVerse promotional material."

Celebrities and influencers, including Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, endorsed Reece Lewis as a strong leader for the HyperVerse.

In 2022, a writer for the British tabloid called The Mirror, Andrew Penman, attempted to raise a red flag, noting that all three of the celebrities (Wozniak, Chuck Norris, and Lance Bass) who endorsed Reece Lewis declined to confirm ever knowing him.

None of the famous figures has ever confirmed that they've met or spoken to Reece Lewis, the Guardian reported, suggesting that it was possible that all three may have been hired to do the marketing videos through Cameo.

While his identity remains in question, his pinned tweet has a link to a promo video for the HyperVerse, with a caption that reads, "where reality ends and imagination begins."

Saved 74% of original text. :::

Chainalysis consumer losses in 2022 were estimated to exceed $1.3 billion. Thousands of consumers lost millions, The Guardian reported.

These two statements are problematic. If thousands (plural) lost millions (plural), the smallest number of consumers would be 2000 and the smallest amount of money be 2000000. This means, at a minimum, consumers would have lost at least 4000000000 (4bil is 2000 2mils). If thousands lost millions, we can say total losses exceed 1.3bil. If total losses exceed 1.3bil, we cannot necessarily say thousands lost millions as, at most, that figure supports 650 people losing a maximum of 2mil.