Let's just make up a new evopsych theory and see how far we can spread it.
I propose: whites are from cold climates where they must spend months at a time snowed in with their families. Therefore, whites have an inherent propensity towards incest, which explains all of their weird incest porn.
What could you possibly find weird about a porno where everyone specifies that they are family but not related by blood after one of them needs help after getting stuck in the dryer or forgetting how to wash their tits in the shower?
Somebody should make a video where halfway through the elaborate Aristocrats scenario, the guy suddenly stops and he's like "wait if you're my step sister . . . and you're my step mother . . . and you're also her step mother . . . Then who is . . . " and then they all look into the camera horrified and the video ends abruptly
White people being one of the few human breeds to still have residual Neanderthal DNA in them, this can be explained for their moral shortcomings. However, this also grown their sense of self-worth to an unsustainably high level, to the point where narcissistic personality disorder, if not every cluster B personality disorder, is the norm among the Caucasoid.
They live in constant envy of one of their true superiors in particular: the Ashkenazim Jews. They tend to look like them, but they hold none of their barbarian tendencies and even more frustrating to the Caucasoid, their narcissism. There is nothing the Caucasoid loathes more than humility.
It’s kinda funny though this is pretty much the reason white people tend to be lactose tolerant. Being able to digest animal milk keeps you alive in the awful frigid winter
This drives me crazy too, and they always cite fucking dogs as an example of "subspecies" to back up this dumb shit even though dog breeds are not genetically distinct at all and are just various types of super-habsburg-jaw
Dog breeds have less genetic diversity between them than cat breeds do. Dogs just have a lot of traits that small genetic changes lead to large phenotypic differences.
Its just easier to make dogs look different than most animals
This guy's on a whole other level, citing misleading pseudoscience to claim human races are entirely different species, akin to wolves and coyotes. Meanwhile a random black person will often be more genetically similar to a random white person than another black person.
There's more genetic variation between 2 communities of chimpanzees separated by a river than all genetic variation in 8 billion humans. Zero basis for us being different sub-species, let alone species. Humans might have diverse phenotypes, but we're extremely genetically alike compared to other species.
They have more chromosomes and the nature of their variation is different compared to humans. A professor of mine talked about it, there are some peculiarities that make stuff like breeding on dogs possible.
As well, if dogs are left to mate independently in the wild after a few generations they return to looking like wolfies.
Not to mention that dog breeds were usually the result of centuries of incest and eugenics, Africa is the most genetically diverse continent as a whole so it's not like those bad bad black people can even remotely be called a "breed" of humans. On top of that, why is it that those bad bad black people usually are more genetically different from other bad bad black people than the wholesome chungus whites?
Regardless, usually I find that these evolutionary psychologists are Christians, and therefore believe in free will. Wouldn't it be blasphemy to make such sweeping judgments about large swathes of people, writing them off as 'all the same'?
literally 80% of this guy's DNA came from outside of Europe from places like neolithic Anatolia Iran and the far southern coast of Russia where there are literal palm trees
The evopsych professor back in 2011 in Cal State Long Beach back when I was in undergrad was an outright white supremacist who the school refused to remove despite multiple racial incidents
My favorite psych professor who despite my low grades was super supportive about of me throughout undergrad, told me that all Evopsych is racist and garbage and to ignore it.
evopsych is obvious horsehit from the word go because humans are the least instinctual animals around. If our behavior was defined so thoroughly through genetics, our languages would all act similarly most likely. They obviously don't do that so more complex, though driven pursuits like gaining a surplus of wealth or wheat obviously can't be operating this way. it also assumes evolution is trying to make ou perfect for you environment, rather than just being a system that does whatever the fuck doesn't get you killed before reproducing. All these sex-based modifications of behavior only work if the women are primed to accept these kinds of displays, so there's no reason westoids wouldn't also do it because this implies all women naturally are. Ironically, this would suggest black men make more sexually desirable partners in this nutjob's worldview, so he's either got an inferiority complex he's covering up by being the"übermensch" who acts like an ant, or he's a cuck.
I'm glad that this is what bluechecks are now, it just feels more honest
my guy doesn't even know his racist psuedoscience particularly well, "evolutionary pressures" are outside factors, so they do stop, it would be the evolved responses to those pressures that can continue even after the outside pressures have abated (if evolution and human behavior worked like that which it decidedly does not).
Also, does he realize that valuable possessions are literally what net worth is? its not just your savings account.... I mean sure, jordans and cars are generally going to depreciate more than houses, but they also don't cost nearly the same amount of money,so theres still a humongous gap there
Not to mention he somehow thinks that evolution made money interchangable with calories, like humans are just too dumb to know why they pursue wealth. Just the densest, crustiest mind
Wouldn't those items also hold value and therefore be attributed to the net worth?
Trigger deadly encounters
Don't you come from the race that's famous for it's genocidal arrogance? You openly brag about the Holocaust, chattel slavery, and the lynching you do unprovoked all the time. And why? What have black people as a collective actually ever done to you, completely unprovoked?
Honestly, we need to start arguing more like CHUDs, and double down on our so-called 'elitism' (as if leftism and elitism aren't a contradiction). Just automatically claim victory if you ever find yourself in an argument, or just say that the truth is complicated and they're too stupid to understand, so of course laymen usually are fascists.
The name of the game here isn't actually proving or disproving anything, but wiping their perpetual shit-eating grins off their faces. Don't engage with them, but do so in a way where you can also win the dick-measuring contest and make them feel a little dumber at the end of the conversation.
Yes several African kingdoms had very advanced and intricate systems of log term crop storage since even crops in tropical/arid regions have specific growing times.
Like theres a dry/wet cycles in tropical regions that necessitate food storage and preservation
It really would be cool to learn some evopsych stuff. However everyone I see some evopsych stuff it is just terrible and the worst quality scholarship. I feel like there ought to be at leat a few things cool to learn there but they are deliberately going out of their way to just try to reinvent scientific rascism.
It really would be cool to learn some evopsych stuff
the reason that homogeneous communities are more altruistic is because a lot of altruistic people tend to be altruistic not only to coracials, but also racial others, in the absence of conflict or propaganda--this makes them less opposed to mixing (which makes the community more homogeneous over time), while nasty people are more opposed to it
the bazinga-brains think everyone's had a 23andme calculator in their head since the neolithic
also if you want example #102971586273562387103897802917065012734982372903856 of mayos not knowing anything outside of the white bubble:
plenty of places in Africa have a monsoonal climate, meaning they get 3-5 months without rain. Basically like a winter but lack of water instead of sun
Depending on what you mean by "cool"... most evopsych stuff that makes it out into the greater world is little more than the psych version of "aliens made the great pyramids in Egypt, Stonehendge, and the ziggurauts in various South American countries."
the fundamental problem is that psychology doesn't leave a fossil record and so like 99% of evopsych is simply coming up with a theory to support your beliefs, on the wildass assumption that human thoughts and behavior are primarily genetic in nature rather than cultural.