Selfhosted @lemmy.world Chewy @discuss.tchncs.de 12 mo. ago

louislam/dockge: A fancy, easy-to-use and reactive self-hosted docker compose.yaml stack-oriented manager

github.com GitHub - louislam/dockge: A fancy, easy-to-use and reactive self-hosted docker compose.yaml stack-oriented manager

A fancy, easy-to-use and reactive self-hosted docker compose.yaml stack-oriented manager - GitHub - louislam/dockge: A fancy, easy-to-use and reactive self-hosted docker compose.yaml stack-oriented...

Features:

Manage compose.yaml
- Create/Edit/Start/Stop/Restart/Delete
- Update Docker Images
Interactive Editor for compose.yaml
Interactive Web Terminal
Reactive
- Everything is just responsive. Progress (Pull/Up/Down) and terminal output are in real-time
Easy-to-use & fancy UI
- If you love Uptime Kuma's UI/UX, you will love this one too
Convert docker run ... commands into compose.yaml
File based structure
- Dockge won't kidnap your compose files, they are stored on your drive as usual. You can interact with them using normal docker compose commands

Cool GitHub Projects @programming.dev λλλ @programming.dev 11 mo. ago

dockge | self-hosted docker compose.yaml stack-oriented manager

github.com /louislam/dockge

21 comments

Dockge won't kidnap your compose files, they are stored on your drive as usual. You can interact with them using normal docker compose commands

FUCK. YES.

This sounds like exactly what I have been looking for.
Finally! Goodbye Portainer!
- Not sure this would entirely replace portainer for me since that manages multiple machines, but I am keen to play with this
  
  This was my first thought as well. This isn't a replacement for portainer agents on mulitple docker hosts, hopefully that's something that is doable in the future.
- I ditched portainer earlier this year to use the command line only, and don't miss it at all. If you're only using docker compose, I really don't see the point of it.
  
  The CLI is just fine. But a Dashboard can give you a much better and faster overview of everything. (Color highlighting and so on)
- What's wrong with Portainer?
  
  A lot of smaller things, at least for me. The biggest grievance I have with it is the garbage tier UX between hitting "Deploy" on a stack and getting ito to do so. Error messages in the notification bubble get cut off, are unhelpful amd/or disappear too fast. That and the L9g Voewer sucking ass are my main problems with it and why I'll definitely check this out.
  
  UI, just too many annoyances. Fkr example the cut off unhelpfull error messages
  
  compose files, like this project calls it are taken hostage by portainer
  
  git, while you can use a repository there is no comfortable way to test out changes and commit them to git. Would portainer use a sinple file structure for compose files that would not be a problem
  
  Ads, they try to promote there business version via the UI.
This is also by the author of Uptime Kuma, which explains the similarity in UI.
- I saw the logo and thought it looked TOO familiar
I'll definitely be checking this out, thanks for the link
Wow! This is beautiful!
Is it a replacement for Unraid docker compose plugin?

You've viewed 21 comments.