A close reading of Twitter’s legal letter to Meta: a guided tour of a weak litigation letter
A close reading of Twitter’s legal letter to Meta: a guided tour of a weak litigation letter
i'm half way through reading only but this is such a cool resource, thanks for sharing. strongly recommend actually reading it, for anyone lurking.
26 0 ReplyOk so it's more a smear media move than a serious accusation?
17 0 ReplyElmo demanded his lawyer send a scary sounding letter to the press.
An actual lawyer reveals it’s a big nothingburger.
19 0 ReplyYeah, but since they bothered with the scary letter, and they knew it was a nothingburger, it must mean the real intention is to either throw dirt at meta or create a distraction from something else
7 0 Reply
So in legalese, it basically says "we are scared but not sure why. GRR!"
16 0 ReplyYep. It also has phrases to convince laypeople otherwise. This letter wasn't written for the client. It was written for the news.
7 0 Reply
Great read thank you. Seems Twitter just blowing smoke.
11 0 ReplyThe audience for this sort of letter is not the other side, still less the court, but the client itself – and perhaps the public and media.
Yep, it's to keep Twitter relevant and try to smear Threads as a competitor.
10 0 ReplyGood article. Knew the threat is bullshit but the author puts it in context.
9 0 ReplyAh, ok. So it's basically the legal equivalent of Macho Man's cream of the crop promo? Got it
4 0 Reply