If I answer more objectively, the free market system should allow the workers to gain bargaining power through strikes and threats of resignation so that the workers can impose meritocracy and accountability on their employers. However, Pax Americana hypocritically impose heavy government intervention to stop the invisible hand from employing hard working innovative scary red boogemen into key positions of Capitalist system. They even goes as far as to open fire at a group of peaceful protestors who demand accountability and meritocracy.
Forgive me for sounding harsh. I’m suppressing the urge to dunk.
I would hardly call that “more objective.” Where I exposed the fact that this system works against proletarian interests, you attack it merely for failing certain ideals. What imperative do the capitalists have to provide opportunity for the expression of opposing interests? They indeed speak of “meritocracy” and “accountability” and act hypocritical in not appearing to live up to those ideals in your eyes, but what of it? How would capitalism be great if the exploiters and rulers all earned their place over others by true merit? “Unaccountable” implies a violation of the law, but what happens when the law goes against working class interests. What good is appealing to the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie to reject its interests to follow some empty ideals?
If I answer more objectively, the free market system should allow the workers to gain bargaining power through strikes and threats of resignation so that the workers can impose meritocracy and accountability on their employers. However, Pax Americana hypocritically impose heavy government intervention to stop the invisible hand from employing hard working innovative scary red boogemen into key positions of Capitalist system. They even goes as far as to open fire at a group of peaceful protestors who demand accountability and meritocracy.
Forgive me for sounding harsh. I’m suppressing the urge to dunk.
I would hardly call that “more objective.” Where I exposed the fact that this system works against proletarian interests, you attack it merely for failing certain ideals. What imperative do the capitalists have to provide opportunity for the expression of opposing interests? They indeed speak of “meritocracy” and “accountability” and act hypocritical in not appearing to live up to those ideals in your eyes, but what of it? How would capitalism be great if the exploiters and rulers all earned their place over others by true merit? “Unaccountable” implies a violation of the law, but what happens when the law goes against working class interests. What good is appealing to the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie to reject its interests to follow some empty ideals?