Why it’s so easy for the US to cut children’s access to healthcare: ‘There’s no right to these programs’
Why it’s so easy for the US to cut children’s access to healthcare: ‘There’s no right to these programs’

Almost 200 countries guarantee children’s rights. Why doesn’t the US?

Experts say the push to cut federal funding for programs that provide health coverage to children speaks to the lack of youth protections in the US
Children’s right to healthcare is not protected in the US. A fact experts say is apparent in the federal budget currently under debate, which would see significant cuts to programs that help low income children afford food and healthcare, like Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (Chip) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap).
“There’s no right to these programs,” said Jonathan Todres, a leading expert on children’s rights and law professor at Georgia State University College of Law. “Medicaid, Chip, those all support millions of children, but they don’t establish a right. So at any time the government can choose to cut these programs.”
Medicaid and Chip provide health coverage to two in five US children, while Snap provides meals to one in five. The current budget would cut $863.4bn from Medicaid and Chip, and $300bn from Snap, over the next decade. Although children under the age of 18 make up about 22% of the US population, Todres notes that spending on youth only amounts to about 10% of the federal budget.