Lemmy.world: why not focus on stability instead of growth?
Lemmy.world: why not focus on stability instead of growth?
This instance happens ti be down quite often. Why do the admin doesn't close the subscription and focus to keep the instance stable? It's not like there will be blocked outside Lemmy, there ar plenty of instances out there. From outside (and IMHO) it seems a power hungry needs (sorry,bI don't know if this does make sense in English). This is a question (that I hope will flow to a good conversation), NOT an attack.
From my understanding, the stability issues drive from repeated DDoS attacks. I’m not sure locking new membership solves that problem but does run the risk of starving new members from joining and risking a shrinkage of content.
I’m sure the admins are focused on more than one thing at a time and closing the site doesn’t seem like it makes a whole lot of sense.
There are plenty of instances, that will not happens, it's not a risk.
Still? In an older post of the Lemmy.world admin I've read that other instances behind Cloudflare don't suffer from this problem.
Since other instances seem to have taken action that suits you better, you can always move your account to one of them. You could still access communities hosted on .world, but you wouldn’t be inconvenienced by DDoS attacks taking down the server.
That’s the beauty of federation.
Admins took the same measures.
They are professionals, you are chasing an idea that does not check out — so to speak.